Elven Farsight
Played in 1,888 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
12.8% Green
3030+21+4+7+14+3+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 3.63 · 39.0% (175 of 449 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 2.67 · 70.3% (26 of 37 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 1.69 · 70.0% (7 of 10 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.49 · 15.8% (15 of 95 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 1.47 · 9.6% (25 of 261 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.31 · 4.4% (56 of 1,263 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.26 · 6.0% (29 of 487 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 1.21 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 1.15 · 2.9% (78 of 2,653 decks)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 1.15 · 2.1% (183 of 8,573 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 1.11 · 3.3% (52 of 1,581 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 1.04 · 20.0% (5 of 25 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.04 · 3.2% (43 of 1,355 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.04 · 2.3% (95 of 4,211 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.02 · 2.4% (74 of 3,092 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 1.01 · 5.5% (16 of 292 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.87 · 2.7% (31 of 1,165 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.85 · 5.4% (10 of 186 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.85 · 4.6% (12 of 262 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.74 · 2.6% (19 of 722 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.70 · 1.6% (46 of 2,914 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.69 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.68 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.62 · 2.3% (14 of 605 decks)
- Wolfsbane, Highland Hero relevance 0.61 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.59 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.57 · 1.6% (22 of 1,398 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (8 of 304 decks)
- Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.52 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.51 · 3.4% (5 of 149 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Charge Through relevance 0.78 · 19.3% (364 of 1,888 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.72 · 22.7% (429 of 1,888 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (219 of 1,888 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.61 · 13.8% (261 of 1,888 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (327 of 1,888 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (202 of 1,888 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (198 of 1,888 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (261 of 1,888 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 0.57 · 16.6% (314 of 1,888 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.57 · 35.9% (678 of 1,888 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (183 of 1,888 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (312 of 1,888 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 0.54 · 15.8% (298 of 1,888 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (288 of 1,888 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (391 of 1,888 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (189 of 1,888 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (211 of 1,888 decks)
- Scavenger Folk relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (145 of 1,888 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (156 of 1,888 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (210 of 1,888 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (182 of 1,888 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (213 of 1,888 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (164 of 1,888 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (173 of 1,888 decks)
- Mending Touch relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (164 of 1,888 decks)
- Elixir relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (148 of 1,888 decks)
- Permeating Mass relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (162 of 1,888 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.50 · 10.1% (190 of 1,888 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (160 of 1,888 decks)
- Team Pennant relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (143 of 1,888 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.72 · 22.7% (429 of 1,888 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (327 of 1,888 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (261 of 1,888 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 0.57 · 16.6% (314 of 1,888 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.57 · 35.9% (678 of 1,888 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (312 of 1,888 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 0.54 · 15.8% (298 of 1,888 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (288 of 1,888 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (391 of 1,888 decks)
- Scavenger Folk relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (145 of 1,888 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (210 of 1,888 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (182 of 1,888 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (164 of 1,888 decks)
- Permeating Mass relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (162 of 1,888 decks)
- Cenote Scout relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (147 of 1,888 decks)
- Llanowar Augur relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (144 of 1,888 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 0.48 · 8.5% (161 of 1,888 decks)
- Oashra Cultivator relevance 0.47 · 7.3% (138 of 1,888 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.46 · 14.9% (281 of 1,888 decks)
- Neverwinter Dryad relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (174 of 1,888 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.46 · 20.3% (383 of 1,888 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Elixir relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (148 of 1,888 decks)
- Team Pennant relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (143 of 1,888 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (182 of 1,888 decks)
- Prosthetic Injector relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (157 of 1,888 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.61 · 13.8% (261 of 1,888 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (202 of 1,888 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (183 of 1,888 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (211 of 1,888 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (156 of 1,888 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (217 of 1,888 decks)
- Dryad's Favor relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (154 of 1,888 decks)
All instants (14)
- Charge Through relevance 0.78 · 19.3% (364 of 1,888 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (198 of 1,888 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (189 of 1,888 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (213 of 1,888 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (173 of 1,888 decks)
- Mending Touch relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (164 of 1,888 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.50 · 10.1% (190 of 1,888 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (160 of 1,888 decks)
- Turn to Dust relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (140 of 1,888 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (187 of 1,888 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.49 · 11.9% (225 of 1,888 decks)
- Warriors' Lesson relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (188 of 1,888 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (163 of 1,888 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (161 of 1,888 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (219 of 1,888 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.47 · 19.4% (367 of 1,888 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 28.0% (528 of 1,888 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (371 of 1,888 decks)
EDH data for Elven Farsight: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,888 real decks.















































































