Cards like Procrastinate
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Procrastinate 38%
- Freeze in Place 38%
- Stall Out 27%
- Tranquilize 19%
- Impede Momentum 15%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
8.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contentious Plan
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Out Cold
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Summon: Shiva
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Summon: Shiva 35%
- Summon: Valefor 19%
Cards like Reject Imperfection
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Out of Bounds, Frazzle, Mindstatic, Convolute, Thoughtbind
Cards like Rimewind Cryomancer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Floodpits Drowner
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Floodpits Drowner 27%
- Splash Lasher 8%
- Snaremaster Sprite 8%
- Referee Squad 8%
- Rowdy Snowballers 4%
- Constrictor Sage 4%
Other options: Frostfist Strider, Shipwreck Patrol
Cards like Essence Flux
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 27%
- Planar Incision 23%
- Teferi's Time Twist 15%
- Spaceshift 4%
Cards like Flux Channeler
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 42%
- Dreamtide Whale 23%
Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Thrummingbird
8.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 19%
- Cloud of Faeries 8%
- Palinchron 4%
- Great Whale 4%
Cards like Borrowing 100,000 Arrows
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Crashing Wave
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 23%
- Prismatic Lens 8%
Other options: Coldsteel Heart, Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk, Star Compass
Cards like Azami, Lady of Scrolls
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thassa, Deep-Dwelling
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Frantic Search
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Heartstone
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Heartstone 15%
- Forensic Gadgeteer 4%
Cards like Omen Hawker
8.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contagion Clasp
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mesmerizing Dose
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Waterknot, Locked in the Cemetery, Tangle Kelp, Blossombind, Stunning Strike, Stay Hidden, Stay Silent, Capture Sphere, Runner's Bane, Ringing Strike Mastery, Sleep Magic, So Shiny, Sleep Paralysis, Unquenchable Thirst, Thirst, Infinite Coursework, Frozen in Ice, Bind the Monster, Castaway's Despair, Winter's Rest, Bewitching Leechcraft, Spectral Prison, Bubble Snare, Sleeping Potion, Charmed Sleep, Motion Sickness, Containment Protocol, Singing Bell Strike, Mystic Restraints, Starlight Snare, Enchanted River's Grasp
Cards like Mind Stone
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 15%
- Chromatic Sphere 4%
Cards like Aetherize
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Aphetto Alchemist
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Filigree Sages, Puppet Strings, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Archaeomancer
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scholar of the Ages
All top picks (50)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.34 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.33 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.35 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Rimewind Cryomancer relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.27 · 46.2% (12 of 26 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.32 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Seasoned Cryomancer relevance 0.33 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.31 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Wicked Slumber relevance 0.32 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 0.28 · 34.6% (9 of 26 decks)
- Succumb to the Cold relevance 0.30 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (13 of 26 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.32 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Fear of Sleep Paralysis relevance 0.28 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Tranquilize relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.29 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.26 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Cryotheory Adept relevance 0.29 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Floodpits Drowner relevance 0.24 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.22 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.20 · 42.3% (11 of 26 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 0.24 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.23 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.21 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.23 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 0.24 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.20 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.20 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.19 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Waylaying Pirates relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Elrond, Moon-Reader relevance 0.21 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Razorfin Abolisher relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Rimewind Cryomancer relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.27 · 46.2% (12 of 26 decks)
- Seasoned Cryomancer relevance 0.33 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 0.28 · 34.6% (9 of 26 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.32 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Fear of Sleep Paralysis relevance 0.28 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Cryotheory Adept relevance 0.29 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Floodpits Drowner relevance 0.24 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.20 · 42.3% (11 of 26 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 0.24 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.23 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Deluge Virtuoso relevance 0.24 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.20 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.21 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.19 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Waylaying Pirates relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Elrond, Moon-Reader relevance 0.21 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Razorfin Abolisher relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Rimewind Taskmage relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.17 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Divining Duelist relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Biomagus relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.17 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Splash Lasher relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Fblthp, Knows the Way relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Bloombrute relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Referee Squad relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.17 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Fateshaper Aspirant relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Rayne, Academy Chancellor relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Kiora's Dambreaker relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.15 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Kiora of Salt and Sand relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Prudent Fateseer // Peer Review relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Nephalia Smuggler relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.15 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Fatehold Chronologist // Peer Review relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.17 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.19 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.14 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Thunderstaff relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Icebind Pillar relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Collector's Case relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sunstone relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Lich's Mirror relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Murmuring Volume relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Chronatog Totem relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- S.H.I.E.L.D. Flying Car relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Terrarion relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.09 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.09 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Sage's Nouliths relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Eye of Ramos relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Forger's Foundry relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.07 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (13 of 26 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.20 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.16 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.15 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Meat Locker // Drowned Diner relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Way of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Way of the Healer relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Time of Ice relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Marit Lage's Slumber relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.13 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.11 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Energy Field relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Wind Zendikon relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Dramatic Accusation relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Bitter Chill relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Claustrophobia relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Way of the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.07 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Kitnap relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Tolarian Contempt relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.05 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All instants (50)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.35 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Wicked Slumber relevance 0.32 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Succumb to the Cold relevance 0.30 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.29 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.22 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.21 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.17 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.14 · 42.3% (11 of 26 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Homesickness relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Something Worth Saving relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Vigorbloom Charm relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.14 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.14 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.12 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.08 · 46.2% (12 of 26 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Icy Reception relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Perfected Theory relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.09 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.09 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Said // Done relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Icy Blast relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.08 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.34 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.33 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.32 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Tranquilize relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.26 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (10 of 26 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.23 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.17 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Involuntary Cooldown relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Hexhaven Battalion relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Extract Power relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Roadside Blowout relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mind Spiral relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.08 · 23.1% (6 of 26 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Pore Over the Pages relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Tempted by the Oriq relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (4 of 26 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.31 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.19 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.04 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All utility lands (36)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.19 · 34.6% (9 of 26 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Frostwalk Bastion relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.09 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.09 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.07 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.07 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.04 · 30.8% (8 of 26 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.05 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.05 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.05 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.05 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.05 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.04 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.03 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.03 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (18)
- Dedicated Commons relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Vigorbloom Annex relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Transformative Commons relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Fatehold Annex relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Innovative Commons relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 19.2% (5 of 26 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 57.7% (15 of 26 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Hapatra, the Desert Frost, from 26 real Commander decks.