Cards like Barkform Harvester
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
80% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Barkform Harvester 77%
- Tomb Trawler 70%
- Hoverstone Pilgrim 54%
- Epitaph Golem 30%
- Junktroller 19%
- Reito Lantern 12%
- Reito Sentinel 6%
- Jade-Cast Sentinel 2%
Other options: Malevolent Chandelier, Cogwork Archivist, Phyrexian Archivist
Cards like Priest of Gix
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Priest of Gix 73%
- Priest of Urabrask 72%
Cards like Sling-Gang Lieutenant
17× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Leaden Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Leaden Myr 37%
- Iron Myr 36%
- Manakin 10%
- Plague Myr 5%
- Hedron Crawler 4%
- Myr Convert 2%
Cards like Goblin Matron
9.7× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Goblin Matron 48%
- Goblin Recruiter 31%
- Boggart Harbinger 20%
Cards like Zulaport Cutthroat
4.0× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Rakdos decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Rakdos decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Zulaport Cutthroat 53%
- Blood Artist 37%
- Vengeful Bloodwitch 4%
- Vindictive Vampire 3%
- Falkenrath Noble 3%
- Venerated Stormsinger 2%
- Susurian Voidborn 2%
Other options: Arnyn, Deathbloom Botanist, Al Bhed Salvagers, Vraan, Executioner Thane, Vein Ripper
Cards like Skirk Prospector
9.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Rakdos decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Beetleback Chief
8.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Sourbread Auntie, Elder Auntie, Underfoot Underdogs
Cards like Mad Auntie
7.8× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
6.0× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Rakdos decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Reckless Barbarian
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Reckless Barbarian 21%
- Blood Vassal 15%
- Catalyst Elemental 12%
- Blood Pet 11%
- Basal Thrull 2%
Cards like Fire Prophecy
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Goblin Chieftain
4.8× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Goblin Chieftain 24%
- Goblin Warchief 23%
- Howlsquad Heavy 10%
Cards like Ardent Electromancer
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Sol Ring
3.3× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 82% of other Rakdos decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.89 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Murderous Redcap
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Murderous Redcap 69%
- Furystoke Giant 15%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Rakdos decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 21%
- Imperial Seal 11%
- Grim Tutor 10%
- Cruel Tutor 3%
Cards like Junk Diver
11× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Junk Diver 19%
- Myr Retriever 18%
- Workshop Assistant 3%
- Scrap Trawler 2%
Other options: Spine of Ish Sah
Cards like Viscera Seer
7.6× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Rakdos decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Chrome Mox
3.6× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 17%
- Mox Diamond 13%
Cards like Red Elemental Blast
2.2× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Rakdos decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
3.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Rakdos decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 17%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 10%
Cards like Accursed Marauder
3.4× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Wasteland Raider, Slum Reaper, Gravelighter, Abyssal Gorestalker, Chain Devil, Merciless Executioner
Cards like Pashalik Mons
3.1× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Warteye Witch
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Soldevi Adnate
20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Soldevi Adnate 19%
- Illuminor Szeras 13%
Other options: Slobad, Iron Goblin, Krark-Clan Stoker, Priest of Yawgmoth
Cards like Pitiless Plunderer
1.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Rakdos decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Wanted Scoundrels, Riveteers Requisitioner, Dire Fleet Hoarder, Piggy Bank, Common Crook, Undercity Dire Rat
Cards like Marionette Apprentice
1.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Rakdos decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Psychomancer, Disciple of the Vault
Cards like Palladium Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Rakdos decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Workhorse
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Cards like Culling the Weak
1.6× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Rakdos decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Cathodion
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Pawn of Ulamog
4.0× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Carrion Feeder
2.7× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Rakdos decks
All top picks (50)
- Barkform Harvester relevance 0.51 · 77.4% (96 of 124 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.50 · 79.8% (99 of 124 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.51 · 75.0% (93 of 124 decks)
- Tomb Trawler relevance 0.52 · 70.2% (87 of 124 decks)
- Hoverstone Pilgrim relevance 0.53 · 54.0% (67 of 124 decks)
- The Cauldron of Eternity relevance 0.52 · 54.8% (68 of 124 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Stylus relevance 0.53 · 47.6% (59 of 124 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.51 · 48.4% (60 of 124 decks)
- Emrakul's Hatcher relevance 0.53 · 41.1% (51 of 124 decks)
- Priest of Urabrask relevance 0.36 · 71.8% (89 of 124 decks)
- Siege-Gang Commander relevance 0.43 · 55.6% (69 of 124 decks)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 0.53 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Woe Strider relevance 0.43 · 50.8% (63 of 124 decks)
- Priest of Gix relevance 0.35 · 73.4% (91 of 124 decks)
- Epitaph Golem relevance 0.53 · 29.8% (37 of 124 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.52 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Thran Turbine relevance 0.53 · 27.4% (34 of 124 decks)
- Clone Shell relevance 0.53 · 27.4% (34 of 124 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 0.42 · 49.2% (61 of 124 decks)
- Leaden Myr relevance 0.48 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Iron Myr relevance 0.47 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.52 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.48 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Murderous Redcap relevance 0.33 · 69.4% (86 of 124 decks)
- Sling-Gang Lieutenant relevance 0.37 · 58.9% (73 of 124 decks)
- Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker relevance 0.34 · 66.1% (82 of 124 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Fire Prophecy relevance 0.51 · 23.4% (29 of 124 decks)
- Beetleback Chief relevance 0.48 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Zealous Conscripts relevance 0.44 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Junktroller relevance 0.52 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Mad Auntie relevance 0.43 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.51 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Volcanic Spite relevance 0.51 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Warteye Witch relevance 0.50 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Viscera Seer relevance 0.29 · 71.0% (88 of 124 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.26 · 81.5% (101 of 124 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.37 · 48.4% (60 of 124 decks)
- Ardent Electromancer relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Soldevi Digger relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Cloak and Dagger relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Faceless Butcher relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Delver relevance 0.49 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Murderous Rider // Swift End relevance 0.46 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Zulaport Cutthroat relevance 0.33 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Prowling Geistcatcher relevance 0.48 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Basal Sliver relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.28 · 69.4% (86 of 124 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Barkform Harvester relevance 0.51 · 77.4% (96 of 124 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.51 · 75.0% (93 of 124 decks)
- Tomb Trawler relevance 0.52 · 70.2% (87 of 124 decks)
- Hoverstone Pilgrim relevance 0.53 · 54.0% (67 of 124 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.51 · 48.4% (60 of 124 decks)
- Emrakul's Hatcher relevance 0.53 · 41.1% (51 of 124 decks)
- Priest of Urabrask relevance 0.36 · 71.8% (89 of 124 decks)
- Siege-Gang Commander relevance 0.43 · 55.6% (69 of 124 decks)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 0.53 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Woe Strider relevance 0.43 · 50.8% (63 of 124 decks)
- Priest of Gix relevance 0.35 · 73.4% (91 of 124 decks)
- Epitaph Golem relevance 0.53 · 29.8% (37 of 124 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.52 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Clone Shell relevance 0.53 · 27.4% (34 of 124 decks)
- Pawn of Ulamog relevance 0.42 · 49.2% (61 of 124 decks)
- Leaden Myr relevance 0.48 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Iron Myr relevance 0.47 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.52 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.48 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Murderous Redcap relevance 0.33 · 69.4% (86 of 124 decks)
- Sling-Gang Lieutenant relevance 0.37 · 58.9% (73 of 124 decks)
- Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker relevance 0.34 · 66.1% (82 of 124 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Beetleback Chief relevance 0.48 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Zealous Conscripts relevance 0.44 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Junktroller relevance 0.52 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Mad Auntie relevance 0.43 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.51 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Warteye Witch relevance 0.50 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Viscera Seer relevance 0.29 · 71.0% (88 of 124 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.37 · 48.4% (60 of 124 decks)
- Ardent Electromancer relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Faceless Butcher relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Delver relevance 0.49 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Murderous Rider // Swift End relevance 0.46 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Zulaport Cutthroat relevance 0.33 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Prowling Geistcatcher relevance 0.48 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Basal Sliver relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.28 · 69.4% (86 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Marshal relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Stadium Vendors relevance 0.49 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Body Launderer relevance 0.49 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Blood Vassal relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Balthor the Defiled relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Furystoke Giant relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Soldevi Adnate relevance 0.44 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Body Snatcher relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.27 · 65.3% (81 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Welder relevance 0.33 · 46.0% (57 of 124 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Heartstone relevance 0.50 · 79.8% (99 of 124 decks)
- The Cauldron of Eternity relevance 0.52 · 54.8% (68 of 124 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Stylus relevance 0.53 · 47.6% (59 of 124 decks)
- Thran Turbine relevance 0.53 · 27.4% (34 of 124 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.26 · 81.5% (101 of 124 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Soldevi Digger relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Cloak and Dagger relevance 0.50 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Reito Lantern relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Darksteel Pendant relevance 0.46 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Desecrated Tomb relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Conjurer's Bauble relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.23 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Nim Deathmantle relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Jar of Eyeballs relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.21 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Charbelcher relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.15 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.14 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Pyre of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.11 · 25.8% (32 of 124 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.11 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.11 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Talisman of Indulgence relevance 0.06 · 37.9% (47 of 124 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (19)
- Mana Echoes relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Braid of Fire relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Mindmoil relevance 0.43 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Shadows of the Past relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Fires of Invention relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Thran Vigil relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.21 · 23.4% (29 of 124 decks)
- Carnival of Souls relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Boggart Mischief relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.11 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Chthonian Nightmare relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All instants (50)
- Fire Prophecy relevance 0.51 · 23.4% (29 of 124 decks)
- Volcanic Spite relevance 0.51 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Manhole Missile relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Brightstone Ritual relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Feign Death relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.15 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Wild Magic Surge relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.14 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.13 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.13 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.12 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Desperate Ritual relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.12 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Imp's Mischief relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- First Day of Class relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Fire Covenant relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.12 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.09 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Terminate relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.10 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.09 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.05 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All sorceries (43)
- Doomsday relevance 0.43 · 24.2% (30 of 124 decks)
- Into the Fire relevance 0.43 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Blood Price relevance 0.46 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.29 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Sinister Waltz relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Sozin's Comet relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.16 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Cruel Tutor relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Reckless Handling relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.12 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.14 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Overmaster relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.13 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.10 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.10 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.08 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.08 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Daretti, Scrap Savant relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.52 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.52 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.50 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.35 · 37.1% (46 of 124 decks)
- Blackbloom Rogue // Blackbloom Bog relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.31 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.28 · 41.9% (52 of 124 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.24 · 54.8% (68 of 124 decks)
- Temple of Malice relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (62 of 124 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.22 · 41.9% (52 of 124 decks)
- Fire Nation Palace relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Akoum Warrior // Akoum Teeth relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.24 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.18 · 29.8% (37 of 124 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Canyon Slough relevance 0.20 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Castle Embereth relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.18 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Guildmages' Forum relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.17 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Howltooth Hollow relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Sokenzan, Crucible of Defiance relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Flamekin Village relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Den of the Bugbear relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.12 · 25.8% (32 of 124 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Hanweir Battlements relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All lands (50)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.38 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Auntie's Hovel relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.25 · 29.8% (37 of 124 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.24 · 29.8% (37 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.20 · 40.3% (50 of 124 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.22 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.23 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Shadowblood Ridge relevance 0.18 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Graven Cairns relevance 0.15 · 55.6% (69 of 124 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Lake of the Dead relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Drossforge Bridge relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Blightstep Pathway // Searstep Pathway relevance 0.15 · 33.1% (41 of 124 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.15 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Blackcleave Cliffs relevance 0.16 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (40 of 124 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.15 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 0.15 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 19.4% (24 of 124 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.15 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Tainted Peak relevance 0.14 · 24.2% (30 of 124 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Haunted Ridge relevance 0.13 · 29.0% (36 of 124 decks)
- Smoldering Marsh relevance 0.11 · 49.2% (61 of 124 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.14 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Dragonskull Summit relevance 0.09 · 62.1% (77 of 124 decks)
- Molten Slagheap relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Grenzo, Dungeon Warden, from 124 real Commander decks.