Cards like Beast Whisperer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 41%
- Cloud of Faeries 26%
- Palinchron 10%
- Great Whale 3%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
3.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Temur decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 41%
- Elvish Mystic 34%
- Fyndhorn Elves 22%
Other options: Llanowar Tribe, Nantuko Elder, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Hardened Scales
8.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Temur decks
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Temur Ascendancy
1.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other Temur decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Temur decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Temur decks
Cards like Benevolent Hydra
5.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen, Taurean Mauler
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Realmwalker
Cards like Reclamation Sage
14× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards like Hydroid Krasis
9.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
11× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Fauna Shaman
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
4.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 28%
- Sylvan Tutor 7%
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
6.2× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.3× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Temur decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 30%
- Swiftfoot Boots 21%
Cards like Fierce Empath
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards like Selvala, Heart of the Wilds
9.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Apex Devastator
1.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Boarding Party
Cards like Goldvein Hydra
2.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.7× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 17%
- Dream Stalker 3%
Other options: Yarok's Wavecrasher, Stickytongue Sentinel, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Biophagus
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Biophagus 23%
- Animal Attendant 2%
Cards like Deflecting Swat
1.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Temur decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.53 · 50.0% (64 of 128 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 54.7% (70 of 128 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.40 · 68.8% (88 of 128 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.51 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.45 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 41.4% (53 of 128 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.47 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.51 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.48 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.49 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.1% (50 of 128 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.41 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.47 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.46 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.50 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.42 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.47 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.43 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.49 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.35 · 50.8% (65 of 128 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Conduit of Ruin relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.35 · 47.7% (61 of 128 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.46 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.41 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.38 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.43 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.46 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.43 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.39 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.36 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.32 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.40 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.41 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.35 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Oblivion Sower relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.53 · 50.0% (64 of 128 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 54.7% (70 of 128 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.40 · 68.8% (88 of 128 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.51 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.45 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 41.4% (53 of 128 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.47 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.51 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.48 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.49 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.1% (50 of 128 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.41 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.47 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.50 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.42 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.47 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.43 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.49 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Conduit of Ruin relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.35 · 47.7% (61 of 128 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.46 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.41 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.38 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.46 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.43 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.36 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.32 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.40 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.41 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Oblivion Sower relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.42 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.32 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
All artifacts (36)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.46 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.43 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.39 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.26 · 26.6% (34 of 128 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 55.5% (71 of 128 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.14 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 67.2% (86 of 128 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.35 · 50.8% (65 of 128 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.35 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.37 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.32 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.22 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.22 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- From Beyond relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.23 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.15 · 49.2% (63 of 128 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.13 · 51.6% (66 of 128 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Bard Class relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Invigorating Hot Spring relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Frostcliff Siege relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
All instants (50)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.31 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.23 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Trap Essence relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.17 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.21 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.19 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.23 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (32 of 128 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.15 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
All sorceries (39)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.40 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.30 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.13 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.08 · 26.6% (34 of 128 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.39 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.40 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.38 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.19 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Shinka, the Bloodsoaked Keep relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.12 · 54.7% (70 of 128 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.17 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.13 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.14 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.15 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.47 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.26 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.27 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.26 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.26 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.23 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 53.9% (69 of 128 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 46.9% (60 of 128 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.19 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.15 · 46.9% (60 of 128 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.21 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.20 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.18 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.21 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 50.8% (65 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Animar, Soul of Elements, from 128 real Commander decks.