Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 64%
- Cloud of Faeries 51%
- Palinchron 17%
- Great Whale 3%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
4.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Temur decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Temur decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 51%
- Elvish Mystic 46%
- Fyndhorn Elves 36%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Leaf Gilder, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Beast Whisperer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Beast Whisperer 81%
- Primordial Sage 30%
- Glimpse of Nature 15%
Cards like Elvish Spirit Guide
8.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
3.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Temur decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
14× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Eldritch Evolution 35%
- Neoform 32%
Cards like Rhystic Study
3.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Temur decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 39%
- Mystic Remora 35%
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Temur decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Temur decks
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Temur decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 35%
- Dream Stalker 8%
Other options: Stickytongue Sentinel, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Fauna Shaman
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
7.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 57%
- Sylvan Tutor 9%
Cards like Force of Will
2.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Force of Will 25%
- Force of Negation 13%
Cards like Chrome Mox
2.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 28%
- Mox Diamond 14%
Cards like Fierce Empath
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Temur decks
Cards like Reclamation Sage
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards like Glen Elendra Archmage
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Transit Mage
19× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards like High Fae Trickster
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
1.7× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Raucous Audience
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
4.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Purphoros, God of the Forge
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.41 · 90.3% (233 of 258 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 80.6% (208 of 258 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.48 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.46 · 40.7% (105 of 258 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 43.8% (113 of 258 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.8% (77 of 258 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.34 · 66.7% (172 of 258 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.49 · 30.2% (78 of 258 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 35.3% (91 of 258 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.49 · 27.5% (71 of 258 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 64.3% (166 of 258 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.42 · 43.4% (112 of 258 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.9% (103 of 258 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.49 · 27.5% (71 of 258 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.44 · 37.2% (96 of 258 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.45 · 34.1% (88 of 258 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.44 · 34.9% (90 of 258 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.51 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.38 · 49.2% (127 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.50 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (53 of 258 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.41 · 37.2% (96 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.51 · 17.4% (45 of 258 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.45 · 28.3% (73 of 258 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (109 of 258 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.39 · 39.1% (101 of 258 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.50 · 14.7% (38 of 258 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.43 · 28.7% (74 of 258 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.44 · 26.7% (69 of 258 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.47 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 22.5% (58 of 258 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 62.4% (161 of 258 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.41 · 32.6% (84 of 258 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (62 of 258 decks)
- Weird Harvest relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Purphoros, God of the Forge relevance 0.39 · 36.8% (95 of 258 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (31 of 258 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (51 of 258 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (29 of 258 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 25.2% (65 of 258 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.44 · 18.2% (47 of 258 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (40 of 258 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (40 of 258 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.41 · 90.3% (233 of 258 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 80.6% (208 of 258 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.48 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.46 · 40.7% (105 of 258 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 43.8% (113 of 258 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.8% (77 of 258 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.34 · 66.7% (172 of 258 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.49 · 30.2% (78 of 258 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 35.3% (91 of 258 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.49 · 27.5% (71 of 258 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 64.3% (166 of 258 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.42 · 43.4% (112 of 258 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.9% (103 of 258 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.49 · 27.5% (71 of 258 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.44 · 37.2% (96 of 258 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.45 · 34.1% (88 of 258 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.44 · 34.9% (90 of 258 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.51 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.38 · 49.2% (127 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.50 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (53 of 258 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.51 · 17.4% (45 of 258 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.45 · 28.3% (73 of 258 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.39 · 39.1% (101 of 258 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.43 · 28.7% (74 of 258 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.44 · 26.7% (69 of 258 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.47 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 22.5% (58 of 258 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 62.4% (161 of 258 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.41 · 32.6% (84 of 258 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (62 of 258 decks)
- Purphoros, God of the Forge relevance 0.39 · 36.8% (95 of 258 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (31 of 258 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (51 of 258 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (29 of 258 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 25.2% (65 of 258 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (40 of 258 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (40 of 258 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Oblivion Sower relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Willbender relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Bond Beetle relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.42 · 18.2% (47 of 258 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.49 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
All artifacts (33)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (109 of 258 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.44 · 18.2% (47 of 258 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (36 of 258 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.38 · 23.6% (61 of 258 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.26 · 25.2% (65 of 258 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (21 of 258 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 15.1% (39 of 258 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (17 of 258 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.16 · 27.5% (71 of 258 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.15 · 31.4% (81 of 258 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (20 of 258 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (36 of 258 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (18 of 258 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 48.4% (125 of 258 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (20 of 258 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 61.2% (158 of 258 decks)
All enchantments (35)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.41 · 37.2% (96 of 258 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.41 · 19.4% (50 of 258 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (21 of 258 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.30 · 35.3% (91 of 258 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (39 of 258 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.41 · 7.8% (20 of 258 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 21.7% (56 of 258 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.27 · 29.8% (77 of 258 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (64 of 258 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (32 of 258 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (18 of 258 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.26 · 10.9% (28 of 258 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 39.1% (101 of 258 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (38 of 258 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.15 · 35.3% (91 of 258 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Frostcliff Siege relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
All instants (50)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (32 of 258 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.44 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (14 of 258 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.24 · 38.4% (99 of 258 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.32 · 12.0% (31 of 258 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (33 of 258 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 57.0% (147 of 258 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 21.7% (56 of 258 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (15 of 258 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (21 of 258 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (19 of 258 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (18 of 258 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.21 · 20.2% (52 of 258 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (129 of 258 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 29.5% (76 of 258 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (26 of 258 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.18 · 29.1% (75 of 258 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 34.9% (90 of 258 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.19 · 23.3% (60 of 258 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (20 of 258 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.18 · 25.6% (66 of 258 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.18 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (14 of 258 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.18 · 25.2% (65 of 258 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.15 · 42.6% (110 of 258 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.20 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (37 of 258 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (13 of 258 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 17.1% (44 of 258 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.16 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (33 of 258 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
All sorceries (28)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.50 · 14.7% (38 of 258 decks)
- Weird Harvest relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.31 · 32.2% (83 of 258 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.24 · 35.3% (91 of 258 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (19 of 258 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (38 of 258 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.21 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (43 of 258 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (39 of 258 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.16 · 11.2% (29 of 258 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (17 of 258 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (50 of 258 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.47 · 5.4% (14 of 258 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.31 · 19.0% (49 of 258 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (20 of 258 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (32 of 258 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.30 · 12.0% (31 of 258 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.24 · 29.1% (75 of 258 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.32 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.30 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.42 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (52 of 258 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (18 of 258 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.26 · 10.1% (26 of 258 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (14 of 258 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.16 · 44.6% (115 of 258 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.23 · 12.8% (33 of 258 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (19 of 258 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (17 of 258 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.18 · 18.2% (47 of 258 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 31.0% (80 of 258 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 41.1% (106 of 258 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (14 of 258 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (12 of 258 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (9 of 258 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (7 of 258 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.50 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.35 · 13.6% (35 of 258 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (24 of 258 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (31 of 258 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.31 · 20.2% (52 of 258 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.29 · 25.2% (65 of 258 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (19 of 258 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (42 of 258 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (25 of 258 decks)
- Thran Quarry relevance 0.43 · 3.9% (10 of 258 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (17 of 258 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.19 · 55.0% (142 of 258 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.21 · 44.2% (114 of 258 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (15 of 258 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.22 · 41.1% (106 of 258 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (23 of 258 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.20 · 46.5% (120 of 258 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (19 of 258 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.23 · 30.6% (79 of 258 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (18 of 258 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.20 · 39.5% (102 of 258 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (26 of 258 decks)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.22 · 27.1% (70 of 258 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (53 of 258 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.24 · 19.8% (51 of 258 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (32 of 258 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 54.7% (141 of 258 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (26 of 258 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (30 of 258 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.23 · 20.9% (54 of 258 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.19 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.22 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (21 of 258 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.18 · 41.1% (106 of 258 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.23 · 17.8% (46 of 258 decks)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 0.20 · 32.2% (83 of 258 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (15 of 258 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (16 of 258 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (22 of 258 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.17 · 39.5% (102 of 258 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (6 of 258 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.16 · 39.9% (103 of 258 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Animar, Soul of Elements, from 258 real Commander decks.