Cards like Brainstorm
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 72%
- Brainsurge 52%
Cards like In Garruk's Wake
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
- In Garruk's Wake 55%
- Plague Wind 27%
Cards like Ponder
16× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 85% of other Esper decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 70%
- Commander's Sphere 50%
Cards like Void Rend
2.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Cards like Hidetsugu and Kairi
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Prognostic Sphinx
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Prognostic Sphinx 73%
- Dream Trawler 14%
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Esper decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 38%
- Swiftfoot Boots 33%
Cards like Preordain
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Preordain 33%
- Serum Visions 17%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Sphinx of Uthuun
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Temporal Mastery
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards like Dovin's Veto
2.7× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other Esper decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Esper decks
Cards like Mystical Tutor
5.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Mystical Tutor 16%
- Personal Tutor 6%
Other options: Eerie Procession, Merchant Scroll, Solve the Equation
Cards like Azorius Signet
1.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Azorius Signet 31%
- Dimir Signet 28%
- Orzhov Signet 20%
Cards like Chancellor of the Spires
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
8.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards like Crystal Ball
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Aqueous Form
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 36%
- Security Bypass 2%
Cards like Rise of the Dark Realms
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.31 · 59.4% (38 of 64 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.33 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.32 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Aminatou, the Fateshifter relevance 0.30 · 60.9% (39 of 64 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.30 · 51.6% (33 of 64 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (40 of 64 decks)
- Vesuvan Drifter relevance 0.31 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.33 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.33 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.29 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Penance relevance 0.35 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.34 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Extinction Event relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.33 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Haunted Crossroads relevance 0.35 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Plague Wind relevance 0.35 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.33 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 0.34 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.34 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.33 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.21 · 71.9% (46 of 64 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.32 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.29 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.28 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Ancient Cellarspawn relevance 0.33 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Weathered Wayfarer relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Baneful Omen relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.18 · 73.4% (47 of 64 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.31 · 59.4% (38 of 64 decks)
- Vesuvan Drifter relevance 0.31 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.33 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.33 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 0.34 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.34 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Ancient Cellarspawn relevance 0.33 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Weathered Wayfarer relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.18 · 73.4% (47 of 64 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Shadrix Silverquill relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Aerial Extortionist relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Serum Sovereign relevance 0.23 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Claim Jumper relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Fatespinner relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Ethersworn Sphinx relevance 0.16 · 65.6% (42 of 64 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.19 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Loran of the Third Path relevance 0.29 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- The Ur-Sphinx relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.28 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Teysa, Envoy of Ghosts relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Guardian of Tazeem relevance 0.25 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Jubilant Skybonder relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Cloudreader Sphinx relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Jelenn Sphinx relevance 0.25 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Marauding Sphinx relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Inniaz, the Gale Force relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.33 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.29 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.34 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 0.30 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.27 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.27 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.24 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Chaos Wand relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.26 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.20 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Aeon Engine relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Progenitor's Icon relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.17 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Obelisk of Esper relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Honored Heirloom relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Seer's Lantern relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Eye of Ojer Taq // Apex Observatory relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Azorius Locket relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.14 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.33 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- Penance relevance 0.35 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Haunted Crossroads relevance 0.35 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.28 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Baneful Omen relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.31 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Oubliette relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Shared Fate relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Debtors' Knell relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Psychic Battle relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Planeswalker's Mischief relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.15 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Charmed Sleep relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Etchings of the Chosen relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Gravitational Shift relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- The Raven's Warning relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Grave Betrayal relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Helm of the Ghastlord relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Timely Ward relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All instants (50)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.30 · 51.6% (33 of 64 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.21 · 71.9% (46 of 64 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.32 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Esper Charm relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.27 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.27 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Emergency Powers relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Render Silent relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.17 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Sphinx's Revelation relevance 0.22 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Obscura Charm relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Fated Return relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Utter End relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Void Rend relevance 0.12 · 57.8% (37 of 64 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Despark relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.16 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.16 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Fracture relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Thassa's Rebuff relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Archenemy's Charm relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Forsake the Worldly relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Desecrate Reality relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.32 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (40 of 64 decks)
- Extinction Event relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Plague Wind relevance 0.35 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.33 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.33 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.29 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Ugin's Insight relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Profane Transfusion relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Index relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.25 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Fractured Identity relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Brilliant Ultimatum relevance 0.24 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.24 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.29 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Moment of Reckoning relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Sadistic Shell Game relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.20 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Unburial Rites relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Lunar Insight relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Gift of Estates relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Aminatou, the Fateshifter relevance 0.30 · 60.9% (39 of 64 decks)
- Dakkon, Shadow Slayer relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Elminster relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Liliana Vess relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Space Beleren relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Ral Zarek, Guest Lecturer relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Venser, the Sojourner relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Hero of Dominaria relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Liliana, Death's Majesty relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.29 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.31 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.20 · 62.5% (40 of 64 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.31 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.31 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.20 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.22 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.27 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.21 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- New Benalia relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 51.6% (33 of 64 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.16 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.09 · 64.1% (41 of 64 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.10 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.11 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Unholy Grotto relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Accursed Duneyard relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Glasswing Grace // Age-Graced Chapel relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All lands (50)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.24 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.24 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.24 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Esper Panorama relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.23 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.24 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.17 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.19 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.13 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.15 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.19 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.10 · 71.9% (46 of 64 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.15 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.11 · 51.6% (33 of 64 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.09 · 75.0% (48 of 64 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.13 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Dromar's Cavern relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Flood Plain relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Shineshadow Snarl relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Tainted Field relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.13 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.14 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Yennett, Cryptic Sovereign, from 64 real Commander decks.