Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
6.6× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Abzan decks
65% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 73%
- Llanowar Elves 58%
- Elvish Mystic 51%
- Fyndhorn Elves 50%
- Boreal Druid 4%
- Steward of Valeron 1%
Other options: Fyndhorn Elder, Nantuko Elder, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Deafening Silence
15× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Deafening Silence 49%
- Eidolon of Rhetoric 27%
- Rule of Law 26%
Other options: Curse of Exhaustion
Cards like Eladamri's Call
11× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Hushbringer
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Archon of Emeria
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Archon of Emeria 48%
- Phyrexian Censor 22%
Cards like Bloom Tender
7.8× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Abzan decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 40%
- Faeburrow Elder 32%
Cards like Voice of Victory
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Voice of Victory 37%
- Grand Abolisher 32%
Cards like Chord of Calling
5.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Stony Silence
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Stony Silence 23%
- Null Rod 17%
Cards like Mother of Runes
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Drana and Linvala
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Chrome Mox
8.3× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 17%
- Mox Diamond 14%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
6.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Manglehorn
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Manglehorn 21%
- Dauntless Dismantler 14%
Cards like Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
3.3× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 76% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Gaddock Teeg
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Gaddock Teeg 24%
- Sanctum Prelate 18%
Cards like Deathrite Shaman
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Path to Exile
4.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.46 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Silence
5.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
3.0× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Survival of the Fittest
6.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
12× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Selfless Spirit
4.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Selfless Savior, Dauntless Bodyguard, Resolute Watchdog
Cards like Smothering Tithe
3.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Collector Ouphe
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Collector Ouphe 51%
- Cursed Totem 1%
All top picks (50)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.57 · 39.8% (76 of 191 decks)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.62 · 24.6% (47 of 191 decks)
- Hushbringer relevance 0.58 · 30.9% (59 of 191 decks)
- Sanctum Prelate relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 51.3% (98 of 191 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.58 · 27.2% (52 of 191 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.45 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.46 · 46.1% (88 of 191 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.45 · 45.5% (87 of 191 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 53.4% (102 of 191 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.49 · 35.1% (67 of 191 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.43 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Archon of Emeria relevance 0.42 · 48.2% (92 of 191 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.40 · 49.7% (95 of 191 decks)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.40 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Gaddock Teeg relevance 0.51 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.53 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.48 · 26.2% (50 of 191 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (29 of 191 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.47 · 26.7% (51 of 191 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (43 of 191 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.1% (48 of 191 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.49 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.42 · 35.6% (68 of 191 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.39 · 41.4% (79 of 191 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.40 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.43 · 27.7% (53 of 191 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.58 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Serra Ascendant relevance 0.38 · 39.3% (75 of 191 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.27 · 72.8% (139 of 191 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (48 of 191 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Kataki, War's Wage relevance 0.49 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.37 · 37.2% (71 of 191 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.36 · 39.8% (76 of 191 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.32 · 51.3% (98 of 191 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.29 · 60.7% (116 of 191 decks)
- Boromir, Warden of the Tower relevance 0.35 · 42.4% (81 of 191 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (42 of 191 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.29 · 59.2% (113 of 191 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.40 · 27.2% (52 of 191 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.33 · 46.1% (88 of 191 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.41 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Strict Proctor relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.44 · 16.2% (31 of 191 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.57 · 39.8% (76 of 191 decks)
- Hushbringer relevance 0.58 · 30.9% (59 of 191 decks)
- Sanctum Prelate relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 51.3% (98 of 191 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.58 · 27.2% (52 of 191 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.45 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.46 · 46.1% (88 of 191 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.45 · 45.5% (87 of 191 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 53.4% (102 of 191 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.49 · 35.1% (67 of 191 decks)
- Archon of Emeria relevance 0.42 · 48.2% (92 of 191 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.40 · 49.7% (95 of 191 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.40 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Gaddock Teeg relevance 0.51 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.53 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (29 of 191 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.47 · 26.7% (51 of 191 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.1% (48 of 191 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.49 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.42 · 35.6% (68 of 191 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.39 · 41.4% (79 of 191 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.40 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.43 · 27.7% (53 of 191 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Serra Ascendant relevance 0.38 · 39.3% (75 of 191 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.27 · 72.8% (139 of 191 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (48 of 191 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
- Kataki, War's Wage relevance 0.49 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.37 · 37.2% (71 of 191 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.36 · 39.8% (76 of 191 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.32 · 51.3% (98 of 191 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.29 · 60.7% (116 of 191 decks)
- Boromir, Warden of the Tower relevance 0.35 · 42.4% (81 of 191 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (42 of 191 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.29 · 59.2% (113 of 191 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.40 · 27.2% (52 of 191 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.33 · 46.1% (88 of 191 decks)
- Strict Proctor relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.44 · 16.2% (31 of 191 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.41 · 22.0% (42 of 191 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.41 · 17.8% (34 of 191 decks)
- Adeline, Resplendent Cathar relevance 0.41 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (33 of 191 decks)
- Aven Interrupter relevance 0.38 · 23.0% (44 of 191 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.37 · 26.7% (51 of 191 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.27 · 57.6% (110 of 191 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (40 of 191 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.58 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.35 · 17.3% (33 of 191 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.40 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Horn of Gondor relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.16 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 70.7% (135 of 191 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.62 · 24.6% (47 of 191 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.43 · 48.7% (93 of 191 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.48 · 26.2% (50 of 191 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (43 of 191 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.41 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.36 · 19.4% (37 of 191 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.37 · 12.0% (23 of 191 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (33 of 191 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.28 · 16.2% (31 of 191 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.23 · 29.8% (57 of 191 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.30 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (11 of 191 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (17 of 191 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (31 of 191 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (22 of 191 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (23 of 191 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (17 of 191 decks)
- Dollmaker's Shop // Porcelain Gallery relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Charitable Levy relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (18 of 191 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Stronghold Arena relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
All instants (50)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.34 · 39.8% (76 of 191 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.33 · 38.2% (73 of 191 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.31 · 42.4% (81 of 191 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.30 · 38.2% (73 of 191 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.28 · 36.6% (70 of 191 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.33 · 19.9% (38 of 191 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.34 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (30 of 191 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.27 · 25.1% (48 of 191 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.27 · 24.6% (47 of 191 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.25 · 21.5% (41 of 191 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (23 of 191 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.29 · 9.9% (19 of 191 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (10 of 191 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.23 · 19.9% (38 of 191 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Calamity's Wake relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.26 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.15 · 55.0% (105 of 191 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (17 of 191 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.20 · 15.2% (29 of 191 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Dire Tactics relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (36 of 191 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 30.9% (59 of 191 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (12 of 191 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.09 · 44.0% (84 of 191 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.06 · 69.1% (132 of 191 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.10 · 25.7% (49 of 191 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (66 of 191 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.35 · 24.6% (47 of 191 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 21.5% (41 of 191 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.25 · 34.6% (66 of 191 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.28 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (12 of 191 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.20 · 12.6% (24 of 191 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (12 of 191 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.15 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Visions of Glory relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 16.8% (32 of 191 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (19 of 191 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Patriarch's Bidding relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 17.8% (34 of 191 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (18 of 191 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Raise the Past relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.09 · 19.9% (38 of 191 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.07 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Sorin of House Markov // Sorin, Ravenous Neonate relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (11 of 191 decks)
- Invasion of Gobakhan // Lightshield Array relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.32 · 23.0% (44 of 191 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.28 · 26.2% (50 of 191 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 51.3% (98 of 191 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (36 of 191 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.29 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.26 · 17.8% (34 of 191 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.24 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.25 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (17 of 191 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.24 · 13.6% (26 of 191 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.21 · 13.1% (25 of 191 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.17 · 30.4% (58 of 191 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (38 of 191 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 9.9% (19 of 191 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (38 of 191 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.18 · 15.7% (30 of 191 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 5.8% (11 of 191 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.17 · 15.7% (30 of 191 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.13 · 43.5% (83 of 191 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (10 of 191 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.18 · 9.9% (19 of 191 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Kor Haven relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (12 of 191 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.10 · 17.3% (33 of 191 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (9 of 191 decks)
- Westvale Abbey // Ormendahl, Profane Prince relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (4 of 191 decks)
All lands (50)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.34 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.30 · 40.3% (77 of 191 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 23.6% (45 of 191 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.31 · 36.1% (69 of 191 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.28 · 46.1% (88 of 191 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (53 of 191 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 29.8% (57 of 191 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.29 · 32.5% (62 of 191 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.28 · 36.6% (70 of 191 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (35 of 191 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.26 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.29 · 26.7% (51 of 191 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.26 · 37.7% (72 of 191 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.29 · 24.1% (46 of 191 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.25 · 36.6% (70 of 191 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.19 · 57.1% (109 of 191 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.18 · 59.7% (114 of 191 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.16 · 69.1% (132 of 191 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 73.3% (140 of 191 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 66.5% (127 of 191 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.17 · 57.1% (109 of 191 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (22 of 191 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (22 of 191 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.11 · 81.7% (156 of 191 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (18 of 191 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.10 · 81.7% (156 of 191 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (11 of 191 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.10 · 81.7% (156 of 191 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (16 of 191 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.15 · 40.3% (77 of 191 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (14 of 191 decks)
- Darkbore Pathway // Slitherbore Pathway relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.14 · 38.7% (74 of 191 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.13 · 36.1% (69 of 191 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (6 of 191 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 12.0% (23 of 191 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (13 of 191 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (24 of 191 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (15 of 191 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (8 of 191 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (5 of 191 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.17 · 5.2% (10 of 191 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (20 of 191 decks)
- Concealed Courtyard relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Tymna the Weaver, from 191 real Commander partner decks.