Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Salvage relevance 0.28 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Elven Cache relevance 0.26 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Loathsome Chimera relevance 0.23 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Voracious Typhon relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Sunstar Lightsmith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- The Rani relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Contraband Livestock relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark for Death relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lawmage's Binding relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sultai Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cessation relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Deathmark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Scourgemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Asylum relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of the Vampire relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jeskai Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Dismantling Blow relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Pillory of the Sleepless relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Mutiny relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cage of Hands relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of the Oni relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Eviction relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Fury relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Make Your Mark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Skymark Roc relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Agonizing Demise relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sentinel's Mark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Reyav, Master Smith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Underworld Coinsmith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mardu Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Chainer's Edict relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Scorchmark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Capture Sphere relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Abzan Runemark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cybernetica Datasmith relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Champion of Dusan relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- East-Mark Cavalier relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Reclaim
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards like Voracious Typhon
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elven Cache
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Elven Cache 60%
- Revive 40%
Other options: Unnatural Restoration, True Ancestry, Nature's Spiral, Recollect, Regrowth
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.51 in other green decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 60%
- Ranger's Guile 40%
Other options: Tyvar's Stand, Blossoming Defense, Woodcutter's Grit, Overprotect
Cards like Gnaw to the Bone
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Barkform Harvester
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Cogwork Archivist, Hoverstone Pilgrim, Junktroller, Jade-Cast Sentinel, Phyrexian Archivist, Tomb Trawler, Reito Sentinel, Reito Lantern
Cards like Predator's Rapport
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Predator's Rapport 20%
- Heal the Scars 20%
Cards like Chomping Kavu
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards like Druidic Ritual
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Wrap in Vigor
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Champion of Dusan
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Sagu Pummeler, Sage of the Fang
Cards like Broken Fall
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Fleetfeather Sandals
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Neurok Hoversail, Wings of Hubris, Cobbled Wings, Kitesail, Bladed Pinions, Aeronaut's Wings
Cards like Unnatural Predation
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Unnatural Predation 20%
- Massive Might 20%
Other options: Chorus of Might, Tread Upon, Confidence from Strength, Awaken the Bear, Staggering Size, Bestow Greatness, Fistful of Force, Crash the Ramparts, Larger Than Life, Bull's Strength, Fanatical Strength, Fully Grown, Blitzball Shot, Wildsize, Unchecked Growth, Fanatical Fever, Predator's Strike
Cards like Heritage Reclamation
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Gaea's Gift
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards like Wilt
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Wilt 20%
- Naturalize 20%
Other options: Oxidize, Krosan Grip, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Natural Reclamation, Wear Away, Break Asunder, Verdigris
Cards like Master's Rebuke
8.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
- Master's Rebuke 20%
- Cosmic Hunger 20%
Other options: Hard-Hitting Question, Compel Brutality, Bite Down
Cards like Fertile Ground
6.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
- Fertile Ground 40%
- Wild Growth 20%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Overgrowth
Cards like Raucous Audience
4.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
- Raucous Audience 20%
- Ilysian Caryatid 20%
Other options: Leafkin Druid, Fanatic of Rhonas, Whisperer of the Wilds
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Loathsome Chimera relevance 0.23 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Voracious Typhon relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Underworld Coinsmith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sunstar Lightsmith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Skymark Roc relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Reyav, Master Smith relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- The Rani relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cybernetica Datasmith relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Champion of Dusan relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- East-Mark Cavalier relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sidequest: Hunt the Mark // Yiazmat, Ultimate Mark relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Stiltstrider relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Riders of the Mark relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sliversmith relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Epitaph Golem relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Malevolent Chandelier relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hooting Mandrills relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Chomping Kavu relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Territorial Maro relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Placid Rottentail relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Wildwood Escort relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Undergrowth Scavenger relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fin-Clade Fugitives relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Scion of the Wild relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Malamet Veteran relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rubblebelt Maverick relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fungal Colossus relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Gnarlroot Pallbearer relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Scaretiller relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Maro relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Pothole Mole relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Stampeding Elk Herd relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Blisterpod relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Skola Grovedancer relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Chrome Companion relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Brutalizer Exarch relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Barkform Harvester relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.09 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
Artifacts
22
Artifacts
22 Showing 1-10 of 22
All artifacts (22)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Firemind Vessel relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Buried Treasure relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jalum Tome relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Feldon's Cane relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Maze Skullbomb relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Horn of the Mark relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vorrac Battlehorns relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.04 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
Enchantments
36
Enchantments
36 Showing 1-10 of 36
All enchantments (36)
- Scourgemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Pillory of the Sleepless relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Fury relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mardu Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Eviction relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cessation relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cage of Hands relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lawmage's Binding relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of the Vampire relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Asylum relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of the Oni relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sentinel's Mark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sultai Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Jeskai Runemark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Capture Sphere relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Abzan Runemark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Temur Runemark relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Nature's Kiss relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Carapace relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Broken Fall relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Crawling Infestation relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.07 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Night Soil relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.05 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.03 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Contraband Livestock relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Dismantling Blow relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Agonizing Demise relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Make Your Mark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Scorchmark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Blossoming Wreath relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vitality Charm relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Heal the Scars relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Gnaw to the Bone relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hunter's Mark relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Unnatural Predation relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sylvan Might relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Piercing Exhale relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hapatra's Mark relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Wildwood Rebirth relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Provoke relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mending Touch relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Massive Might relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Predator's Rapport relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Natural State relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Bombadil's Song relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.08 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.07 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.06 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.06 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
Sorceries
32
Sorceries
32 Showing 1-10 of 32
All sorceries (32)
- Salvage relevance 0.28 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Elven Cache relevance 0.26 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Mark for Death relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mark of Mutiny relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Deathmark relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Chainer's Edict relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Finishing Move relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Monstrify relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Culling Mark relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Invigorating Falls relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tapping at the Window relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lay of the Land relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.06 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.03 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.02 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.01 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
Utility Lands
31
Utility Lands
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
All utility lands (31)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.21 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Turntimber Grove relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.14 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.14 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.14 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.12 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Quicksand relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.09 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Desert relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.03 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
Lands
35
Lands
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
All lands (35)
- Shimmerdrift Vale relevance 0.23 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.18 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.16 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Nomad Outpost relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.11 · 80.0% (4 of 5 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cryptic Spires relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.13 · 60.0% (3 of 5 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Timberland Ruins relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Island relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.05 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.05 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 80.0% (4 of 5 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Hermit Druid, from 5 real Commander decks.