Glimpse the Future
Played in 35 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Helmut Zemo, Mastermind relevance 0.77 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.72 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.53 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.51 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (12)
- Strategic Planning relevance 1.31 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.93 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.61 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.53 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.53 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.49 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.48 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.53 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.53 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
All instants (5)
- Anticipate relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.93 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.61 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Strategic Planning relevance 1.31 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.49 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.48 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.48 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
EDH data for Glimpse the Future: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35 real decks.