Glimpse the Future
Played in 342 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
12
Commanders
12All commanders (12)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Candlekeep Sage relevance 1.17 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor relevance 0.97 · 1.9% (2 of 104 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.80 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Helmut Zemo, Mastermind relevance 0.77 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The First Doctor // Ryan Sinclair relevance 0.77 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.72 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.55 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.53 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.52 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
Parallel Cards
9
Parallel Cards
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Strategic Planning relevance 1.32 · 20.5% (70 of 342 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 1.09 · 15.2% (52 of 342 decks)
- Divination relevance 1.05 · 17.0% (58 of 342 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.97 · 15.2% (52 of 342 decks)
- Pieces of the Puzzle relevance 0.97 · 12.3% (42 of 342 decks)
- Ancestral Memories relevance 0.89 · 10.5% (36 of 342 decks)
- Chill of Foreboding relevance 0.88 · 10.2% (35 of 342 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.87 · 14.0% (48 of 342 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.85 · 17.0% (58 of 342 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.83 · 10.8% (37 of 342 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (69 of 342 decks)
- Glintwing Invoker relevance 0.80 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Graxiplon relevance 0.79 · 6.7% (23 of 342 decks)
- Dream Twist relevance 0.78 · 10.8% (37 of 342 decks)
- Glacial Crasher relevance 0.78 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.77 · 12.6% (43 of 342 decks)
- Inspiration from Beyond relevance 0.77 · 11.4% (39 of 342 decks)
- Gurmag Drowner relevance 0.77 · 7.6% (26 of 342 decks)
- Glacial Stalker relevance 0.77 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Ghastly Discovery relevance 0.77 · 8.2% (28 of 342 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.77 · 13.5% (46 of 342 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 0.77 · 9.9% (34 of 342 decks)
- Nagging Thoughts relevance 0.76 · 8.8% (30 of 342 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (100 of 342 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.76 · 10.2% (35 of 342 decks)
- Witness the Future relevance 0.76 · 9.4% (32 of 342 decks)
- Ghosthelm Courier relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.75 · 7.9% (27 of 342 decks)
- Galedrifter // Waildrifter relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Gossamer Phantasm relevance 0.75 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
Creatures
20
Creatures
20 All creatures (20)
- Glintwing Invoker relevance 0.80 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Graxiplon relevance 0.79 · 6.7% (23 of 342 decks)
- Glacial Crasher relevance 0.78 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Gurmag Drowner relevance 0.77 · 7.6% (26 of 342 decks)
- Glacial Stalker relevance 0.77 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Ghosthelm Courier relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.75 · 7.9% (27 of 342 decks)
- Galedrifter // Waildrifter relevance 0.75 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Gossamer Phantasm relevance 0.75 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Gempalm Sorcerer relevance 0.74 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Giant Albatross relevance 0.74 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Bubbling Beebles relevance 0.73 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Gearsmith Prodigy relevance 0.73 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Glitch Ghost Surveyor relevance 0.73 · 7.6% (26 of 342 decks)
- Giant Octopus relevance 0.73 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Gliding Licid relevance 0.72 · 6.7% (23 of 342 decks)
- Glimmering Angel relevance 0.72 · 6.1% (21 of 342 decks)
- Ghost-Lit Drifter relevance 0.72 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
- Fugitive Wizard relevance 0.72 · 7.0% (24 of 342 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 0.72 · 8.8% (30 of 342 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 All enchantments (2)
- Evanescent Intellect relevance 0.72 · 7.6% (26 of 342 decks)
- Glimmerdust Nap relevance 0.72 · 6.7% (23 of 342 decks)
Instants
11
Instants
11 All instants (11)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.97 · 15.2% (52 of 342 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.87 · 14.0% (48 of 342 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.85 · 17.0% (58 of 342 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (69 of 342 decks)
- Dream Twist relevance 0.78 · 10.8% (37 of 342 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.77 · 12.6% (43 of 342 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.76 · 29.2% (100 of 342 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.76 · 10.2% (35 of 342 decks)
- Frost Breath relevance 0.75 · 9.1% (31 of 342 decks)
- Scattered Thoughts relevance 0.74 · 9.4% (32 of 342 decks)
- Glyph of Delusion relevance 0.73 · 7.3% (25 of 342 decks)
Sorceries
17
Sorceries
17 All sorceries (17)
- Strategic Planning relevance 1.32 · 20.5% (70 of 342 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 1.09 · 15.2% (52 of 342 decks)
- Divination relevance 1.05 · 17.0% (58 of 342 decks)
- Pieces of the Puzzle relevance 0.97 · 12.3% (42 of 342 decks)
- Ancestral Memories relevance 0.89 · 10.5% (36 of 342 decks)
- Chill of Foreboding relevance 0.88 · 10.2% (35 of 342 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.83 · 10.8% (37 of 342 decks)
- Inspiration from Beyond relevance 0.77 · 11.4% (39 of 342 decks)
- Ghastly Discovery relevance 0.77 · 8.2% (28 of 342 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.77 · 13.5% (46 of 342 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 0.77 · 9.9% (34 of 342 decks)
- Nagging Thoughts relevance 0.76 · 8.8% (30 of 342 decks)
- Witness the Future relevance 0.76 · 9.4% (32 of 342 decks)
- Covenant of Minds relevance 0.73 · 8.5% (29 of 342 decks)
- Cruel Fate relevance 0.73 · 6.7% (23 of 342 decks)
- Ghostform relevance 0.72 · 9.4% (32 of 342 decks)
- Bamboozle relevance 0.72 · 7.6% (26 of 342 decks)
EDH data for Glimpse the Future: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 342 real decks.






































































