Cosmic Hunger
Played in 248 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Selesnya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Danitha, New Benalia's Light relevance 1.26 · 2.2% (10 of 463 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 1.12 · 1.2% (13 of 1,071 decks)
- Ohabi Caleria relevance 1.08 · 1.2% (12 of 1,025 decks)
- Jennifer Walters // The Sensational She-Hulk relevance 1.06 · 1.1% (12 of 1,078 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.99 · 3.5% (4 of 113 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.86 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Akroma, Vision of Ixidor // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Buxton, Decorated Host relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bite Down relevance 1.83 · 36.3% (90 of 248 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 1.29 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (68 of 248 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (50 of 248 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.64 · 24.6% (61 of 248 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (38 of 248 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Tandem Takedown relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.51 · 14.1% (35 of 248 decks)
- Angelic Intervention relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (51 of 248 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (26 of 248 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.34 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.34 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Enduring Bondwarden relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Leinore, Autumn Sovereign relevance 0.31 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (26 of 248 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (51 of 248 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
All instants (25)
- Bite Down relevance 1.83 · 36.3% (90 of 248 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 1.29 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (68 of 248 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.64 · 24.6% (61 of 248 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (38 of 248 decks)
- Tandem Takedown relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.51 · 14.1% (35 of 248 decks)
- Angelic Intervention relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (24 of 248 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Gods Willing relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (50 of 248 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Storm the Seedcore relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.52 · 34.3% (85 of 248 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.38 · 29.8% (74 of 248 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.34 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (29 of 248 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
EDH data for Cosmic Hunger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 248 real decks.