Briarhorn
Played in 28 Abzan decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (1)
- Ravos, Soultender // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.45 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
All most relevant (10)
- Shriekmaw relevance 2.91 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 2.44 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Vesperlark relevance 1.90 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.95 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Viscera Seer relevance 0.90 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.86 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.76 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.65 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.65 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Shriekmaw relevance 2.91 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 2.44 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Vesperlark relevance 1.90 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.95 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Viscera Seer relevance 0.90 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.76 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.65 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Austere Command relevance 0.86 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.65 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.58 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Deceptive Landscape relevance 0.57 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
All lands (6)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.78 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.61 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.40 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.39 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.37 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Briarhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.