Bred for the Hunt
Played in 1,589 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
4.2% Witch-Maw
330+28+3+5+5+3+1+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 2.07 · 22.1% (259 of 1,172 decks)
- Atraxa, Praetors' Voice relevance 1.18 · 5.0% (1,281 of 25,697 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.12 · 1.4% (6 of 437 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.83 · 69.2% (1,100 of 1,589 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.73 · 63.2% (1,005 of 1,589 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.72 · 73.8% (1,172 of 1,589 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.64 · 71.9% (1,142 of 1,589 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.63 · 70.6% (1,122 of 1,589 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.61 · 56.3% (894 of 1,589 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 1.57 · 47.7% (758 of 1,589 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.45 · 48.7% (774 of 1,589 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 1.41 · 49.3% (784 of 1,589 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.22 · 37.3% (592 of 1,589 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 1.22 · 30.6% (486 of 1,589 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 1.21 · 40.5% (644 of 1,589 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 1.16 · 31.0% (492 of 1,589 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.15 · 43.3% (688 of 1,589 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.10 · 37.3% (592 of 1,589 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 1.04 · 23.7% (377 of 1,589 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 1.04 · 23.8% (378 of 1,589 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.04 · 27.6% (438 of 1,589 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.00 · 33.7% (535 of 1,589 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.00 · 33.4% (531 of 1,589 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.99 · 32.8% (521 of 1,589 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.99 · 31.0% (493 of 1,589 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.99 · 31.9% (507 of 1,589 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.97 · 24.1% (383 of 1,589 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.96 · 28.3% (450 of 1,589 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (340 of 1,589 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.94 · 36.7% (583 of 1,589 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.91 · 32.3% (513 of 1,589 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.90 · 21.3% (338 of 1,589 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.86 · 18.2% (289 of 1,589 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.73 · 63.2% (1,005 of 1,589 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.72 · 73.8% (1,172 of 1,589 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.63 · 70.6% (1,122 of 1,589 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.61 · 56.3% (894 of 1,589 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 1.57 · 47.7% (758 of 1,589 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.45 · 48.7% (774 of 1,589 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 1.41 · 49.3% (784 of 1,589 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.22 · 37.3% (592 of 1,589 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 1.22 · 30.6% (486 of 1,589 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 1.16 · 31.0% (492 of 1,589 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.15 · 43.3% (688 of 1,589 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.10 · 37.3% (592 of 1,589 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 1.04 · 23.7% (377 of 1,589 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.04 · 27.6% (438 of 1,589 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.00 · 33.7% (535 of 1,589 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.99 · 32.8% (521 of 1,589 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.99 · 31.0% (493 of 1,589 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.97 · 24.1% (383 of 1,589 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.96 · 28.3% (450 of 1,589 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.94 · 36.7% (583 of 1,589 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.90 · 21.3% (338 of 1,589 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.86 · 18.2% (289 of 1,589 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.83 · 27.3% (434 of 1,589 decks)
- Elite Scaleguard relevance 0.82 · 17.1% (271 of 1,589 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.81 · 23.3% (371 of 1,589 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.80 · 23.5% (373 of 1,589 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.80 · 46.8% (744 of 1,589 decks)
- Vulturous Zombie relevance 0.80 · 16.1% (256 of 1,589 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (255 of 1,589 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.75 · 24.4% (387 of 1,589 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.74 · 27.8% (442 of 1,589 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.64 · 71.9% (1,142 of 1,589 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 1.21 · 40.5% (644 of 1,589 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.00 · 33.4% (531 of 1,589 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (340 of 1,589 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.91 · 32.3% (513 of 1,589 decks)
All instants (5)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.83 · 69.2% (1,100 of 1,589 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 1.04 · 23.8% (378 of 1,589 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.84 · 27.1% (431 of 1,589 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.82 · 27.0% (429 of 1,589 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 0.77 · 16.5% (262 of 1,589 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.99 · 31.9% (507 of 1,589 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 0.78 · 18.9% (301 of 1,589 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.75 · 23.4% (372 of 1,589 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.97 · 32.9% (522 of 1,589 decks)
All lands (5)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.83 · 50.3% (800 of 1,589 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.78 · 42.2% (670 of 1,589 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.78 · 25.8% (410 of 1,589 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.74 · 35.5% (564 of 1,589 decks)
- Dreadship Reef relevance 0.74 · 22.6% (359 of 1,589 decks)
EDH data for Bred for the Hunt: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,589 real decks.













































