130+33+4+3+7+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
9.2% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
Garruk, Caller of Beasts 33.9% of decks
Garruk, Caller of Beasts 33.9% of decks
Garruk's Harbinger 31.3% of decks
Garruk's Harbinger 31.3% of decks
Garruk, Unleashed 27.0% of decks
Garruk, Unleashed 27.0% of decks
Garruk, Primal Hunter 29.6% of decks
Garruk, Primal Hunter 29.6% of decks
Garruk Wildspeaker 20.0% of decks
Garruk Wildspeaker 20.0% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 41.7% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 41.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Raised by Giants // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 1.87 · 33.9% (39 of 115 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.58 · 31.3% (36 of 115 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 1.51 · 27.0% (31 of 115 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.16 · 29.6% (34 of 115 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 1.03 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.01 · 41.7% (48 of 115 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.98 · 22.6% (26 of 115 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 20.9% (24 of 115 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.77 · 25.2% (29 of 115 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.73 · 25.2% (29 of 115 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (22 of 115 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.69 · 22.6% (26 of 115 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (25 of 115 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (18 of 115 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 29.6% (34 of 115 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (18 of 115 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.65 · 33.9% (39 of 115 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.64 · 44.3% (51 of 115 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.63 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (15 of 115 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.62 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.61 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (17 of 115 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (14 of 115 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.54 · 12.2% (14 of 115 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.54 · 19.1% (22 of 115 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.58 · 31.3% (36 of 115 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.01 · 41.7% (48 of 115 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.98 · 22.6% (26 of 115 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 20.9% (24 of 115 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.77 · 25.2% (29 of 115 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.73 · 25.2% (29 of 115 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (22 of 115 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.69 · 22.6% (26 of 115 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (25 of 115 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (18 of 115 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 29.6% (34 of 115 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (18 of 115 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.65 · 33.9% (39 of 115 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.63 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.62 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (20 of 115 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.61 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (17 of 115 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (16 of 115 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (14 of 115 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.54 · 12.2% (14 of 115 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.54 · 19.1% (22 of 115 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (11 of 115 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (11 of 115 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (18 of 115 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (13 of 115 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (12 of 115 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (9 of 115 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (29 of 115 decks)
- Proud Wildbonder relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (12 of 115 decks)
All instants (4)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.64 · 44.3% (51 of 115 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.54 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.51 · 20.9% (24 of 115 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.47 · 18.3% (21 of 115 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (41 of 115 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.46 · 14.8% (17 of 115 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.46 · 16.5% (19 of 115 decks)
All planeswalkers (7)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 1.87 · 33.9% (39 of 115 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 1.51 · 27.0% (31 of 115 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.16 · 29.6% (34 of 115 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 1.03 · 20.0% (23 of 115 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (15 of 115 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (11 of 115 decks)
- Domri, Chaos Bringer relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (11 of 115 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.56 · 24.3% (28 of 115 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (19 of 115 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 31.3% (36 of 115 decks)
EDH data for Garruk, Savage Herald: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 115 real decks.


































