Guild Feud
Played in 100 Naya decks
130+35+3+5+1+4+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Gruul Ragebeast 29.0% of decks
Gruul Ragebeast 29.0% of decks
Lurking Predators 37.0% of decks
Lurking Predators 37.0% of decks
Spearbreaker Behemoth 18.0% of decks
Spearbreaker Behemoth 18.0% of decks
Gisela, Blade of Goldnight 29.0% of decks
Gisela, Blade of Goldnight 29.0% of decks
Blazing Archon 18.0% of decks
Blazing Archon 18.0% of decks
Archetype of Endurance 20.0% of decks
Archetype of Endurance 20.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 2.33 · 1.4% (30 of 2,092 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.60 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 1.33 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.01 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.98 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.96 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.95 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.94 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.87 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.87 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.87 · 23.0% (23 of 100 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Where Ancients Tread relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.83 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.80 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.80 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.74 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.72 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.70 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.68 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Godsire relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.60 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.01 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.98 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.96 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.94 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.89 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.87 · 23.0% (23 of 100 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.83 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.80 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.80 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.74 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.72 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.70 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.68 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Godsire relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.61 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.56 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.54 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.53 · 31.0% (31 of 100 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.87 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Doors of Durin relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Lurking Predators relevance 1.33 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Where Ancients Tread relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.59 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.57 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
All instants (1)
- Prizefight relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.95 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.87 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.61 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Arena relevance 0.70 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.54 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
EDH data for Guild Feud: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 100 real decks.































