30+34+1+7+1+1+3+3+
Color Identity Spread
2.2% Witch-Maw
Most Relevant
Evolution Witness 45.3% of decks
Evolution Witness 45.3% of decks
Fathom Mage 58.7% of decks
Fathom Mage 58.7% of decks
Emperor of Bones 20.0% of decks
Emperor of Bones 20.0% of decks
Plaxcaster Frogling 24.0% of decks
Plaxcaster Frogling 24.0% of decks
Basking Broodscale 25.3% of decks
Basking Broodscale 25.3% of decks
Inspiring Call 41.3% of decks
Inspiring Call 41.3% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Evolution Witness relevance 1.44 · 45.3% (34 of 75 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.36 · 58.7% (44 of 75 decks)
- Emperor of Bones relevance 1.18 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 1.18 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 1.15 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.3% (31 of 75 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 1.08 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.06 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.05 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 1.04 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.03 · 36.0% (27 of 75 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.03 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.99 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.93 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.90 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.85 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.83 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Fetid Gargantua relevance 0.83 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.80 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.80 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.78 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.77 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.77 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.76 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.75 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Spike Feeder relevance 0.73 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Evolution Witness relevance 1.44 · 45.3% (34 of 75 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.36 · 58.7% (44 of 75 decks)
- Emperor of Bones relevance 1.18 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 1.18 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 1.15 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 1.08 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.05 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.03 · 36.0% (27 of 75 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.03 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.99 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.93 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.90 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.85 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.83 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Fetid Gargantua relevance 0.83 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.80 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.77 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.77 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.76 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Spike Feeder relevance 0.73 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.71 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Spike Weaver relevance 0.68 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.67 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Generous Pup relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.65 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.63 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.63 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.75 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.06 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 1.04 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.80 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.78 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.71 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.71 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.71 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.3% (31 of 75 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Damning Verdict relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.96 · 36.0% (27 of 75 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.82 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
All lands (3)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.83 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.71 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 0.62 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
EDH data for Sharktocrab: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 75 real decks.






























