Phantasmal Abomination
Played in 12 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
3.5% Bant
- Blue 265 · 77.0%
- Azorius 20 · 5.8%
- Izzet 16 · 4.7%
- Bant 12 · 3.5%
- Dimir 11 · 3.2%
- Simic 7 · 2.0%
- Other (5) 13 · 3.8%
Most Relevant
All most relevant (8)
- Guardians of Meletis relevance 3.95 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Academy Wall relevance 3.88 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 2.46 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 2.42 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 2.25 · 75.0% (9 of 12 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 1.50 · 75.0% (9 of 12 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 1.29 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 1.06 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Guardians of Meletis relevance 3.95 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Academy Wall relevance 3.88 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 2.46 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 2.42 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 2.25 · 75.0% (9 of 12 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 1.29 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 1.50 · 75.0% (9 of 12 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 1.06 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.94 · 66.7% (8 of 12 decks)
EDH data for Phantasmal Abomination: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 12 real decks.