Suffer the Past
Played in 255 Sultai decks
230+19+1+2+15+13+
Color Identity Spread
5.4% Sultai
Commanders
Most Relevant
Hydroid Krasis 63.5% of decks
Hydroid Krasis 63.5% of decks
Syncopate 40.4% of decks
Syncopate 40.4% of decks
Curse of the Swine 47.1% of decks
Curse of the Swine 47.1% of decks
Unbound Flourishing 46.3% of decks
Unbound Flourishing 46.3% of decks
Condescend 34.5% of decks
Condescend 34.5% of decks
Exsanguinate 54.5% of decks
Exsanguinate 54.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 2.66 · 1.6% (183 of 11,802 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.88 · 63.5% (162 of 255 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.61 · 40.4% (103 of 255 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.48 · 47.1% (120 of 255 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 1.47 · 46.3% (118 of 255 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.45 · 34.5% (88 of 255 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.44 · 54.5% (139 of 255 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.39 · 39.6% (101 of 255 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 1.37 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.36 · 40.4% (103 of 255 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.30 · 30.6% (78 of 255 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 1.29 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.27 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.26 · 37.3% (95 of 255 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.21 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.20 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Slice from the Shadows relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 1.15 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.14 · 23.1% (59 of 255 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 1.14 · 23.5% (60 of 255 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 1.13 · 32.2% (82 of 255 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.12 · 52.2% (133 of 255 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.10 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.09 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.09 · 22.0% (56 of 255 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.08 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.06 · 32.2% (82 of 255 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.05 · 31.4% (80 of 255 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.04 · 33.7% (86 of 255 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 1.01 · 23.1% (59 of 255 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 1.01 · 22.0% (56 of 255 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.88 · 63.5% (162 of 255 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 1.29 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.27 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.21 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.09 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.09 · 22.0% (56 of 255 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.06 · 32.2% (82 of 255 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.05 · 31.4% (80 of 255 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.04 · 33.7% (86 of 255 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 1.01 · 23.1% (59 of 255 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 1.00 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 0.96 · 25.5% (65 of 255 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.96 · 28.2% (72 of 255 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 0.96 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 0.95 · 21.2% (54 of 255 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.90 · 23.9% (61 of 255 decks)
- Jadelight Spelunker relevance 0.87 · 14.1% (36 of 255 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 0.87 · 24.7% (63 of 255 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.39 · 39.6% (101 of 255 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 1.47 · 46.3% (118 of 255 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 1.14 · 23.5% (60 of 255 decks)
All instants (15)
- Syncopate relevance 1.61 · 40.4% (103 of 255 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.45 · 34.5% (88 of 255 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.30 · 30.6% (78 of 255 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.26 · 37.3% (95 of 255 decks)
- Slice from the Shadows relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.14 · 23.1% (59 of 255 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 1.13 · 32.2% (82 of 255 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 1.00 · 29.0% (74 of 255 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.96 · 16.9% (43 of 255 decks)
- Death Wind relevance 0.94 · 16.1% (41 of 255 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 0.91 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 0.88 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.88 · 18.8% (48 of 255 decks)
- Icy Blast relevance 0.88 · 18.8% (48 of 255 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.85 · 19.2% (49 of 255 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.48 · 47.1% (120 of 255 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.44 · 54.5% (139 of 255 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 1.37 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.36 · 40.4% (103 of 255 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.20 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 1.15 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.12 · 52.2% (133 of 255 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.10 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.08 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 1.01 · 22.0% (56 of 255 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.99 · 18.8% (48 of 255 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.92 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.90 · 25.5% (65 of 255 decks)
EDH data for Suffer the Past: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 255 real decks.

















































