Midnight Charm
Played in 164 Black decks
Color Identity Spread
32.0% Black
All commanders (12)
- Horobi, Death's Wail relevance 1.58 · 1.1% (18 of 1,690 decks)
- The Destined Black Mage relevance 1.16 · 1.5% (6 of 407 decks)
- Ihsan's Shade relevance 0.73 · 2.2% (2 of 90 decks)
- Swarm, Being of Bees relevance 0.57 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- White Widow, Yelena Belova relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Citizen V, Helmut Zemo relevance 0.47 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Gothmog, Morgul Lieutenant relevance 0.47 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Winter, Tormented Loner relevance 0.46 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Azula, On the Hunt relevance 0.46 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Purraj of Urborg relevance 0.45 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Thanos, Death's Consort relevance 0.40 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.94 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Ebony Charm relevance 0.85 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Alchemist's Gift relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Funeral Charm relevance 0.73 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.69 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Nightmare's Thirst relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Mirrodin Avenged relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Gravebind relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Archenemy's Charm relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Dissection Practice relevance 0.54 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Coat with Venom relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Professor's Warning relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Blessing of Belzenlok relevance 0.50 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Dash Hopes relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Undying Malice relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Consuming Corruption relevance 0.47 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Lose Hope relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Deathgreeter relevance 0.44 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Shadow Alley Denizen relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Desperate Measures relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Ashnod's Intervention relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Vile Rebirth relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Banehound relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Supernatural Stamina relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.40 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Darkblast relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Deathgreeter relevance 0.44 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Shadow Alley Denizen relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Banehound relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Vampiric Link relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
All instants (42)
- Aphotic Wisps relevance 0.94 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Ebony Charm relevance 0.85 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Alchemist's Gift relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Funeral Charm relevance 0.73 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Armor of Shadows relevance 0.69 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Nightmare's Thirst relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Mirrodin Avenged relevance 0.59 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Gravebind relevance 0.57 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Archenemy's Charm relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Dissection Practice relevance 0.54 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Coat with Venom relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Professor's Warning relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Blessing of Belzenlok relevance 0.50 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Dash Hopes relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Undying Malice relevance 0.47 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Consuming Corruption relevance 0.47 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
- Lose Hope relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- March of Wretched Sorrow relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Desperate Measures relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Ashnod's Intervention relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Vile Rebirth relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Supernatural Stamina relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.40 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Darkblast relevance 0.39 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Undying Evil relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Disfigure relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Fungal Infection relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Essence Extraction relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Darkness relevance 0.36 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Moment of Craving relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Rat Out relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Afflict relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
- Toxin Analysis relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Wail of the Nim relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Feign Death relevance 0.34 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.34 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Locust Spray relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Shelob's Ambush relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (9 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Nighthaze relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Consume Spirit relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Midnight Charm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.