Cerulean Drake

Played in 78 Dimir decks

Cerulean Drake
$0.11 €0.13

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All commanders (4)
  1. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.29 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
  2. Shameless Charlatan // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 1.29 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
  3. Feywild Visitor // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.99 · 4.4% (2 of 45 decks)
  4. Criminal Past // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Diversion Unit
    0.73 12.8%
    $0.29 €0.11
  • Counterpoint
    0.67 15.4%
    $0.38 €0.40
  • Siren Stormtamer
    0.61 20.5%
    $0.49 €0.69
  • Annul
    0.57 12.8%
    $0.26 €0.17
  • Cancel
    0.56 14.1%
    $0.27 €0.25
  • Countersquall
    0.55 19.2%
    $0.92 €0.59
  • Bane's Contingency
    0.55 10.3%
    $0.22 €0.24
  • Nezumi Prowler
    0.55 14.1%
    $0.65 €0.13
  • Azra Smokeshaper
    0.52 11.5%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Silver Raven
    0.50 10.3%
    $0.28 €0.16
All most relevant (30)
  1. Diversion Unit relevance 0.73 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  2. Counterpoint relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  3. Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
  4. Annul relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  5. Cancel relevance 0.56 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  6. Countersquall relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
  7. Bane's Contingency relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  8. Nezumi Prowler relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  9. Azra Smokeshaper relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  10. Silver Raven relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  11. Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.48 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
  12. Covert Technician relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  13. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
  14. Phantom Ninja relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  15. Sky Diamond relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  16. Spectral Sailor relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  17. Dimir Charm relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  18. Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  19. Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  20. Prosperous Thief relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
  21. Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  22. Negate relevance 0.39 · 32.1% (25 of 78 decks)
  23. Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  24. Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  25. Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  26. Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  27. Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.37 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  28. Arcane Denial relevance 0.37 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
  29. Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  30. Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)

Creatures

29

Showing 1-10 of 29

Page size
  • Diversion Unit
    0.73 12.8%
    $0.29 €0.11
  • Siren Stormtamer
    0.61 20.5%
    $0.49 €0.69
  • Nezumi Prowler
    0.55 14.1%
    $0.65 €0.13
  • Azra Smokeshaper
    0.52 11.5%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Silver Raven
    0.50 10.3%
    $0.28 €0.16
  • Moon-Circuit Hacker
    0.48 17.9%
    $0.32 €0.42
  • Covert Technician
    0.45 10.3%
    $0.27 €0.07
  • Phantom Ninja
    0.43 10.3%
    $0.23 €0.08
  • Spectral Sailor
    0.42 14.1%
    $0.27 €0.20
  • Mistblade Shinobi
    0.41 15.4%
    $3.36 €1.61
All creatures (29)
  1. Diversion Unit relevance 0.73 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  2. Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
  3. Nezumi Prowler relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  4. Azra Smokeshaper relevance 0.52 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  5. Silver Raven relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  6. Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.48 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
  7. Covert Technician relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  8. Phantom Ninja relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  9. Spectral Sailor relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  10. Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  11. Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  12. Prosperous Thief relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
  13. Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  14. Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  15. Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  16. Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  17. Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
  18. Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.37 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  19. Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  20. Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  21. Baleful Strix relevance 0.34 · 23.1% (18 of 78 decks)
  22. Silver-Fur Master relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  23. Ornithopter relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  24. Slither Blade relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  25. Fallen Shinobi relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  26. Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.31 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  27. Invisible Stalker relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  28. Tormented Soul relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  29. Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Sapphire Medallion
    0.44 17.9%
    $8.90 €5.71
  • Sky Diamond
    0.42 15.4%
    $0.26 €0.16
  • Charcoal Diamond
    0.35 12.8%
    $0.35 €0.18
  • Jet Medallion
    0.34 14.1%
    $14.60 €9.06
  • Commander's Sphere
    0.29 14.1%
    $0.35 €0.15
All artifacts (5)
  1. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
  2. Sky Diamond relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  3. Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  4. Jet Medallion relevance 0.34 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  5. Commander's Sphere relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)

Instants

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Counterpoint
    0.67 15.4%
    $0.38 €0.40
  • Annul
    0.57 12.8%
    $0.26 €0.17
  • Cancel
    0.56 14.1%
    $0.27 €0.25
  • Countersquall
    0.55 19.2%
    $0.92 €0.59
  • Bane's Contingency
    0.55 10.3%
    $0.22 €0.24
  • Dimir Charm
    0.41 10.3%
    $0.45 €0.23
  • Negate
    0.39 32.1%
    $0.22 €0.09
  • Arcane Denial
    0.37 26.9%
    $2.10 €2.14
  • Spell Pierce
    0.33 11.5%
    $0.32 €0.22
All instants (9)
  1. Counterpoint relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
  2. Annul relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
  3. Cancel relevance 0.56 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
  4. Countersquall relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
  5. Bane's Contingency relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  6. Dimir Charm relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
  7. Negate relevance 0.39 · 32.1% (25 of 78 decks)
  8. Arcane Denial relevance 0.37 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
  9. Spell Pierce relevance 0.33 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Singularity Rupture
    0.30 14.1%
    $1.90 €0.52
All sorceries (1)
  1. Singularity Rupture relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Kaito, Bane of Nightmares
    0.31 10.3%
    $11.40 €11.56
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Kaito, Bane of Nightmares relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Rogue's Passage
    0.35 24.4%
    $0.77 €1.68
  • Creeping Tar Pit
    0.27 10.3%
    $0.35 €0.31
All utility lands (2)
  1. Rogue's Passage relevance 0.35 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
  2. Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)

Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Dismal Backwater
    0.45 23.1%
    $0.16 €0.08
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.40 20.5%
    $0.29 €0.13
  • Contaminated Aquifer
    0.31 10.3%
    $0.38 €0.68
All lands (3)
  1. Dismal Backwater relevance 0.45 · 23.1% (18 of 78 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.40 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
  3. Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)

EDH data for Cerulean Drake: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 78 real decks.