Magmatic Force
Played in 205 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 2.82 · 3.0% (62 of 2,070 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 0.76 · 1.4% (3 of 211 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.42 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Terastodon relevance 2.05 · 49.3% (101 of 205 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 1.59 · 32.2% (66 of 205 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 1.54 · 33.7% (69 of 205 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.53 · 40.5% (83 of 205 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.46 · 43.4% (89 of 205 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 1.39 · 25.9% (53 of 205 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 1.36 · 22.0% (45 of 205 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 1.27 · 36.6% (75 of 205 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 1.16 · 21.0% (43 of 205 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.15 · 19.0% (39 of 205 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 1.08 · 22.4% (46 of 205 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 1.01 · 33.2% (68 of 205 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.99 · 19.5% (40 of 205 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.96 · 36.6% (75 of 205 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (37 of 205 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.94 · 39.0% (80 of 205 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (41 of 205 decks)
- Thermopod relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (29 of 205 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (27 of 205 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (60 of 205 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.85 · 49.3% (101 of 205 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.85 · 13.7% (28 of 205 decks)
- Culling Dais relevance 0.84 · 18.0% (37 of 205 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (34 of 205 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.82 · 37.6% (77 of 205 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Fanatical Devotion relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (41 of 205 decks)
- Roc Egg relevance 0.80 · 16.6% (34 of 205 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Terastodon relevance 2.05 · 49.3% (101 of 205 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 1.59 · 32.2% (66 of 205 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 1.54 · 33.7% (69 of 205 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.53 · 40.5% (83 of 205 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.46 · 43.4% (89 of 205 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 1.39 · 25.9% (53 of 205 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 1.36 · 22.0% (45 of 205 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 1.27 · 36.6% (75 of 205 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 1.16 · 21.0% (43 of 205 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.15 · 19.0% (39 of 205 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 1.08 · 22.4% (46 of 205 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.99 · 19.5% (40 of 205 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.96 · 36.6% (75 of 205 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.96 · 18.0% (37 of 205 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.94 · 39.0% (80 of 205 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (41 of 205 decks)
- Thermopod relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (29 of 205 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (27 of 205 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.85 · 49.3% (101 of 205 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.85 · 13.7% (28 of 205 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (34 of 205 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.82 · 37.6% (77 of 205 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Roc Egg relevance 0.80 · 16.6% (34 of 205 decks)
- Dragon Egg relevance 0.79 · 16.6% (34 of 205 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.79 · 43.9% (90 of 205 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.76 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.74 · 13.2% (27 of 205 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.74 · 13.2% (27 of 205 decks)
- Curious Colossus relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (26 of 205 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (29 of 205 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.73 · 13.2% (27 of 205 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (29 of 205 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (36 of 205 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.68 · 15.6% (32 of 205 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Culling Dais relevance 0.84 · 18.0% (37 of 205 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.76 · 24.9% (51 of 205 decks)
- Battlemage's Bracers relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (24 of 205 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (60 of 205 decks)
- Fanatical Devotion relevance 0.81 · 20.0% (41 of 205 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.78 · 53.2% (109 of 205 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (49 of 205 decks)
- Barrage of Expendables relevance 0.68 · 10.7% (22 of 205 decks)
All instants (2)
- Sundering Growth relevance 1.01 · 33.2% (68 of 205 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.70 · 22.9% (47 of 205 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ghired's Belligerence relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (29 of 205 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- High Market relevance 0.87 · 25.4% (52 of 205 decks)
All lands (1)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.71 · 28.3% (58 of 205 decks)
EDH data for Magmatic Force: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 205 real decks.