Devour in Flames
Played in 30 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
6.5% Izzet
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 0.76 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All most relevant (11)
- Rolling Thunder relevance 1.70 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 1.41 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Lightning Axe relevance 1.27 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.80 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.69 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.53 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.51 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.48 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.46 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.41 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.80 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Parun relevance 0.51 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.46 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
All instants (6)
- Lightning Axe relevance 1.27 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.69 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.53 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.48 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.41 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Rolling Thunder relevance 1.70 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 1.41 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.93 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
All lands (3)
- Highland Lake relevance 1.09 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.94 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.61 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
EDH data for Devour in Flames: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 30 real decks.