230+41+5+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Grixis
Commanders
Most Relevant
Abyssal Persecutor 18.2% of decks
Abyssal Persecutor 18.2% of decks
Lord of Change 27.3% of decks
Lord of Change 27.3% of decks
Herald of Slaanesh 29.5% of decks
Herald of Slaanesh 29.5% of decks
Bloodgift Demon 23.9% of decks
Bloodgift Demon 23.9% of decks
Clone 19.3% of decks
Clone 19.3% of decks
Desecration Demon 17.0% of decks
Desecration Demon 17.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Nicol Bolas relevance 2.28 · 2.1% (16 of 756 decks)
- Sol'kanar the Swamp King relevance 1.44 · 1.5% (6 of 402 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.11 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 1.03 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Herald of Slaanesh relevance 1.03 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 1.01 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Clone relevance 1.00 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 0.98 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Prince of Thralls relevance 0.94 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Reaper from the Abyss relevance 0.93 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Sol'kanar the Swamp King relevance 0.92 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Sower of Discord relevance 0.86 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Doomsday Excruciator relevance 0.84 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Hypnotic Specter relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Demon of Loathing relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Kothophed, Soul Hoarder relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Terror relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.76 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Raphael, Fiendish Savior relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Rakdos, Lord of Riots relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Bloodletter of Aclazotz relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Demonlord Belzenlok relevance 0.71 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 0.71 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 0.70 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Liliana's Contract relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Abhorrent Overlord relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Great Unclean One relevance 0.69 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.11 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 1.03 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Herald of Slaanesh relevance 1.03 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 1.01 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Clone relevance 1.00 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 0.98 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Prince of Thralls relevance 0.94 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Reaper from the Abyss relevance 0.93 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Sol'kanar the Swamp King relevance 0.92 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Sower of Discord relevance 0.86 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Doomsday Excruciator relevance 0.84 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Hypnotic Specter relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Demon of Loathing relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Kothophed, Soul Hoarder relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.76 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Raphael, Fiendish Savior relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Rakdos, Lord of Riots relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Bloodletter of Aclazotz relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Demonlord Belzenlok relevance 0.71 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 0.71 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 0.70 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Abhorrent Overlord relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Great Unclean One relevance 0.69 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Bloodcrusher of Khorne relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Lord of the Void relevance 0.67 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Plague Drone relevance 0.67 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Rakdos, the Showstopper relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Kardur, Doomscourge relevance 0.60 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, Unshackled relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Venomcrawler relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Bringer of the Last Gift relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Jon Irenicus, Shattered One relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Bazaar Trader relevance 0.58 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Archfiend of Despair relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Liliana's Contract relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Demonic Covenant relevance 0.63 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Greed relevance 0.61 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Fireball relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Lord of the Pit: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.


























