Word of Command
Played in 156 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
9.7% Grixis
All commanders (5)
- Nicol Bolas relevance 1.99 · 2.1% (16 of 749 decks)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.14 · 4.2% (3 of 72 decks)
- Gwendlyn Di Corci relevance 1.11 · 2.0% (4 of 198 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.46 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cruel Entertainment relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Worst Fears relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.80 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
- Chains of Mephistopheles relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.75 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.72 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.71 · 43.6% (68 of 156 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.71 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.66 · 35.9% (56 of 156 decks)
- Sorin Markov relevance 0.64 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.64 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Mind Twist relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.62 · 38.5% (60 of 156 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.61 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.61 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.61 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.60 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Knowledge Pool relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (34 of 156 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Head Games relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.58 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.57 · 36.5% (57 of 156 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.72 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.64 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.58 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.55 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.75 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.61 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.61 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Knowledge Pool relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.56 · 19.9% (31 of 156 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Chains of Mephistopheles relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.57 · 36.5% (57 of 156 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.57 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.55 · 26.3% (41 of 156 decks)
All instants (8)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.62 · 38.5% (60 of 156 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.61 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.60 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.55 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Cruel Entertainment relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Worst Fears relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.80 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.71 · 43.6% (68 of 156 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.71 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.66 · 35.9% (56 of 156 decks)
- Mind Twist relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (34 of 156 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Head Games relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.53 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Sorin Markov relevance 0.64 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.68 · 35.3% (55 of 156 decks)
All lands (10)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.96 · 48.7% (76 of 156 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.96 · 48.7% (76 of 156 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.94 · 48.1% (75 of 156 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.65 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.65 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.62 · 47.4% (74 of 156 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (29 of 156 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.56 · 26.3% (41 of 156 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.56 · 42.9% (67 of 156 decks)
EDH data for Word of Command: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 156 real decks.