Mighty Emergence
Played in 106 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (1)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot // Master Chef relevance 0.93 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.41 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.38 · 36.8% (39 of 106 decks)
- Where Ancients Tread relevance 1.25 · 27.4% (29 of 106 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.01 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.00 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.97 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.86 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.85 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.82 · 26.4% (28 of 106 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.80 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.79 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.76 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.72 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.71 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.68 · 30.2% (32 of 106 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (25 of 106 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.67 · 21.7% (23 of 106 decks)
- Ridgescale Tusker relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (13 of 106 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.65 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.63 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.60 · 27.4% (29 of 106 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.56 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Leatherhead, Swamp Stalker relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
All creatures (38)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.41 · 34.9% (37 of 106 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.38 · 36.8% (39 of 106 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.01 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.00 · 41.5% (44 of 106 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.97 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.86 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.85 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.82 · 26.4% (28 of 106 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.79 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.76 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.72 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.71 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.68 · 30.2% (32 of 106 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (25 of 106 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.67 · 21.7% (23 of 106 decks)
- Ridgescale Tusker relevance 0.66 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.65 · 12.3% (13 of 106 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.65 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.63 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Cragplate Baloth relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Leatherhead, Swamp Stalker relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.53 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 0.52 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Shaleskin Bruiser relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Where Ancients Tread relevance 1.25 · 27.4% (29 of 106 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.80 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.60 · 27.4% (29 of 106 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
All instants (1)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.56 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.53 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Vengeful Rebirth relevance 0.53 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Michelangelo's Technique relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 0.97 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.60 · 26.4% (28 of 106 decks)
EDH data for Mighty Emergence: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 106 real decks.