Winds of Qal Sisma
Played in 331 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (12)
- The Chief Warg relevance 2.51 · 6.5% (24 of 371 decks)
- Agent of the Shadow Thieves // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.27 · 2.1% (8 of 374 decks)
- Atlas, Sizable Stooge relevance 0.97 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Sarevok, Deathbringer relevance 0.89 · 1.9% (4 of 211 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.55 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.52 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Haunted One // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Killmonger, Scourge of Wakanda relevance 0.37 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.35 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Euru, Acorn Scrounger relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fog relevance 0.99 · 31.4% (104 of 331 decks)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (49 of 331 decks)
- Wargling relevance 0.66 · 13.6% (45 of 331 decks)
- Duskwatch Hunter relevance 0.65 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.65 · 24.2% (80 of 331 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.65 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Bejeweled Warg relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (47 of 331 decks)
- Chief Warg's Company relevance 0.64 · 15.1% (50 of 331 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 0.63 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Ravening Warg relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (42 of 331 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (35 of 331 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (34 of 331 decks)
- Head of the Hunt relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (43 of 331 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (39 of 331 decks)
- Nighthowl Pursuer relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (38 of 331 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.53 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.52 · 13.9% (46 of 331 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (35 of 331 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (42 of 331 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Reverent Howl relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (29 of 331 decks)
- Haze of Pollen relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (24 of 331 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (34 of 331 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (33 of 331 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (31 of 331 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (31 of 331 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 0.68 · 14.8% (49 of 331 decks)
- Wargling relevance 0.66 · 13.6% (45 of 331 decks)
- Duskwatch Hunter relevance 0.65 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.65 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Bejeweled Warg relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (47 of 331 decks)
- Chief Warg's Company relevance 0.64 · 15.1% (50 of 331 decks)
- Ravening Warg relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (42 of 331 decks)
- Head of the Hunt relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (43 of 331 decks)
- Nighthowl Pursuer relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (38 of 331 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (33 of 331 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (31 of 331 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (31 of 331 decks)
- Desolation Prowler relevance 0.44 · 7.9% (26 of 331 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (30 of 331 decks)
- Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (32 of 331 decks)
- Nasty Little Rabbit relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (20 of 331 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (34 of 331 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.65 · 24.2% (80 of 331 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.53 · 10.9% (36 of 331 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (34 of 331 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (31 of 331 decks)
All instants (16)
- Fog relevance 0.99 · 31.4% (104 of 331 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 0.63 · 11.2% (37 of 331 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (35 of 331 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (34 of 331 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.52 · 13.9% (46 of 331 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (35 of 331 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (42 of 331 decks)
- Reverent Howl relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (29 of 331 decks)
- Haze of Pollen relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (24 of 331 decks)
- Warg Tactics relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (27 of 331 decks)
- Moonlight Hunt relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (27 of 331 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (40 of 331 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (25 of 331 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (25 of 331 decks)
- Quarrel relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (21 of 331 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (30 of 331 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (39 of 331 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.44 · 32.0% (106 of 331 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 20.2% (67 of 331 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (44 of 331 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.49 · 28.7% (95 of 331 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.42 · 26.3% (87 of 331 decks)
- Mirkwood relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (26 of 331 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (25 of 331 decks)
EDH data for Winds of Qal Sisma: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 331 real decks.