Flame On!
Played in 301 Izzet decks
1330+8+4+4+12+17+3+2+
Color Identity Spread
9.3% Izzet
-
Ink-Treader 2,237 · 69.0%
-
Red 377 · 11.6%
-
Izzet 301 · 9.3%
-
Boros 69 · 2.1%
- Other (15) 259 · 8.0%
Commanders
The Emperor of Palamecia // The Lord Master of Hell 2.2% of decks
The Emperor of Palamecia // The Lord Master of Hell 2.2% of decks
Iceman and Firestar 15.8% of decks
Iceman and Firestar 15.8% of decks
Speedball, New Warrior 3.2% of decks
Speedball, New Warrior 3.2% of decks
Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger 1.7% of decks
Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger 1.7% of decks
Melek, Reforged Researcher 1.4% of decks
Melek, Reforged Researcher 1.4% of decks
Spider-Man 2099 1.2% of decks
Spider-Man 2099 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Nova Flame 37.9% of decks
Nova Flame 37.9% of decks
Fantastic Elasticity 15.3% of decks
Fantastic Elasticity 15.3% of decks
Traumatize 22.6% of decks
Traumatize 22.6% of decks
Cut Your Losses 20.6% of decks
Cut Your Losses 20.6% of decks
Isengard Unleashed 16.6% of decks
Isengard Unleashed 16.6% of decks
Rewind 25.9% of decks
Rewind 25.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (13)
- The Emperor of Palamecia // The Lord Master of Hell relevance 2.62 · 2.2% (103 of 4,661 decks)
- Iceman and Firestar relevance 1.80 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Speedball, New Warrior relevance 1.75 · 3.2% (15 of 465 decks)
- Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 1.51 · 1.7% (17 of 975 decks)
- Melek, Reforged Researcher relevance 1.38 · 1.4% (16 of 1,117 decks)
- Spider-Man 2099 relevance 1.37 · 1.2% (19 of 1,580 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 1.32 · 1.0% (20 of 1,905 decks)
- Astonishing Spider-Man relevance 1.07 · 1.4% (8 of 555 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Dragon Cultist relevance 0.60 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Uvilda, Dean of Perfection // Nassari, Dean of Expression relevance 0.56 · 1.6% (2 of 126 decks)
- Iron Lad, Young Avenger relevance 0.37 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Yasmin Khan // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nova Flame relevance 2.46 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 1.04 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.99 · 22.6% (68 of 301 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.93 · 20.6% (62 of 301 decks)
- Isengard Unleashed relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.77 · 25.9% (78 of 301 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.75 · 24.3% (73 of 301 decks)
- Prompto Argentum relevance 0.73 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.72 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.70 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Rapturous Moment relevance 0.70 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Seize the Day relevance 0.68 · 19.3% (58 of 301 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.68 · 35.9% (108 of 301 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.63 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.62 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.61 · 35.9% (108 of 301 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (63 of 301 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.61 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- The Scarlet Witch relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.60 · 47.2% (142 of 301 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.58 · 42.9% (129 of 301 decks)
- Channeled Force relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Prompto Argentum relevance 0.73 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.61 · 35.9% (108 of 301 decks)
- The Scarlet Witch relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Spellheart Chimera relevance 0.53 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.75 · 24.3% (73 of 301 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.61 · 32.9% (99 of 301 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Mjölnir, Hammer of Thor relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.62 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Zephid's Embrace relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Clout of the Dominus relevance 0.49 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
All instants (12)
- Rewind relevance 0.77 · 25.9% (78 of 301 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.72 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.70 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.68 · 35.9% (108 of 301 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (63 of 301 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.60 · 47.2% (142 of 301 decks)
- Channeled Force relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.49 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.49 · 18.6% (56 of 301 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Nova Flame relevance 2.46 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 1.04 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.99 · 22.6% (68 of 301 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.93 · 20.6% (62 of 301 decks)
- Isengard Unleashed relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Rapturous Moment relevance 0.70 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Seize the Day relevance 0.68 · 19.3% (58 of 301 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.63 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.58 · 42.9% (129 of 301 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Insult // Injury relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Summons of Saruman relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Bond of Insight relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.48 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Full Throttle relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.47 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Hex Magic relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.57 · 26.9% (81 of 301 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.50 · 37.9% (114 of 301 decks)
- Stark Industries relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
All lands (2)
- Scorched Geyser relevance 0.59 · 30.6% (92 of 301 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.47 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
EDH data for Flame On!: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 301 real decks.





















































