Color Identity Spread
9.8% Naya
- Selesnya 244 · 45.9%
- Five-Color 177 · 33.3%
- Naya 52 · 9.8%
- Bant 29 · 5.5%
- Abzan 14 · 2.6%
- Other (7) 16 · 3.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.46 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.61 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.51 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 1.56 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.49 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 1.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.17 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.14 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Arcus Acolyte relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.04 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.03 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.90 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.84 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Feisty Spikeling relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.77 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.74 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.68 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Irregular Cohort relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.66 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.63 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.62 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.61 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.59 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.58 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.55 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.55 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 1.56 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.49 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 1.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 1.17 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.14 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.12 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Arcus Acolyte relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.04 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.03 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.90 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.84 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Feisty Spikeling relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.74 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Irregular Cohort relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.66 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.63 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.62 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.61 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.59 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.58 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.55 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.55 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.51 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.77 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.68 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.51 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.35 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.42 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.37 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All lands (12)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.57 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.52 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.49 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.48 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.45 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.41 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Battlefield Forge relevance 0.36 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.30 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Ohabi Caleria: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.