Consuming Bonfire
Played in 18 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
18.4% Izzet
15+14+1+
All most relevant (15)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 4.95 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 4.10 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 3.63 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Flaring Cinder relevance 3.54 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 3.54 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 3.36 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 3.07 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Enraged Flamecaster relevance 2.88 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 2.86 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 2.86 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 2.71 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 2.39 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 2.25 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.95 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Tanufel Rimespeaker relevance 1.78 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 4.95 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 4.10 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 3.63 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Flaring Cinder relevance 3.54 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 3.54 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 3.36 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 3.07 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Enraged Flamecaster relevance 2.88 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 2.86 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 2.86 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 2.71 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 2.39 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 2.25 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Tanufel Rimespeaker relevance 1.78 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.95 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
EDH data for Consuming Bonfire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 18 real decks.















