Riptide Chronologist
Played in 35 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
17.6% Grixis
130+39+1+2+5+2+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Garza Zol, Plague Queen relevance 0.61 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 3.32 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 2.74 · 74.3% (26 of 35 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 2.74 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 2.68 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 2.65 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 2.56 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 2.49 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 2.48 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Step Through relevance 2.26 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.25 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 1.99 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.94 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 1.94 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.91 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 1.88 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 1.70 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Sage of Fables relevance 1.70 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Vela the Night-Clad relevance 1.68 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Sigil Tracer relevance 1.68 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 1.61 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 1.59 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 1.58 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Anathemancer relevance 1.58 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 1.48 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 1.47 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 1.42 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 1.40 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Vindictive Lich relevance 1.36 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Puppeteer Clique relevance 1.36 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 1.34 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 3.32 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 2.74 · 74.3% (26 of 35 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 2.74 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 2.68 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 2.65 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 2.56 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 2.48 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.25 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 1.99 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.94 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 1.94 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 1.88 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 1.70 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Sage of Fables relevance 1.70 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Vela the Night-Clad relevance 1.68 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Sigil Tracer relevance 1.68 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 1.61 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 1.59 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 1.58 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Anathemancer relevance 1.58 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 1.48 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 1.47 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 1.40 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Vindictive Lich relevance 1.36 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Puppeteer Clique relevance 1.36 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Beguiler of Wills relevance 1.34 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 1.31 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 1.31 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.28 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 1.27 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.23 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 1.20 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 1.17 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 1.14 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 1.11 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Kuja, Genome Sorcerer // Trance Kuja, Fate Defied relevance 1.04 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Timestream Navigator relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.97 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 0.95 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.93 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 2.49 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.88 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
All instants (5)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.91 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 1.42 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 1.12 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 1.05 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.01 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Step Through relevance 2.26 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 1.19 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 2.06 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
EDH data for Riptide Chronologist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35 real decks.
































