Labyrinth Champion
Played in 60 Red decks
Color Identity Spread
15.1% Red
All commanders (6)
- Rosnakht, Heir of Rohgahh relevance 1.57 · 1.5% (7 of 466 decks)
- Bill Potts relevance 0.98 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Cleon, Merry Champion relevance 0.77 · 1.1% (2 of 176 decks)
- Erkenbrand, Lord of Westfold relevance 0.65 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Tyrox, Saurid Tyrant relevance 0.53 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Goddric, Cloaked Reveler relevance 0.48 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Akroan Crusader relevance 2.83 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Rosnakht, Heir of Rohgahh relevance 1.59 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Frontline Heroism relevance 1.13 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Emberheart Challenger relevance 1.07 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Heartfire Hero relevance 1.06 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 1.04 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Coordinated Assault relevance 1.02 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Balduvian Rage relevance 1.01 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.96 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.92 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 0.91 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.83 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Invigorated Rampage relevance 0.80 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.79 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.77 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.77 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Mirrorwing Dragon relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.74 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Coming In Hot relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.73 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Sudden Breakthrough relevance 0.73 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 0.71 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 0.69 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.68 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Uncaged Fury relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Akroan Crusader relevance 2.83 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Rosnakht, Heir of Rohgahh relevance 1.59 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Emberheart Challenger relevance 1.07 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Heartfire Hero relevance 1.06 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.77 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Mirrorwing Dragon relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.73 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.51 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Firebending Student relevance 0.48 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.47 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Frontline Heroism relevance 1.13 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.74 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 0.69 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Leyline of Resonance relevance 0.56 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
All instants (28)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 1.04 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Coordinated Assault relevance 1.02 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Balduvian Rage relevance 1.01 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.96 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.92 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 0.91 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Brute Force relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Titan's Strength relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Invigorated Rampage relevance 0.80 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.79 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.77 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Coming In Hot relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Sudden Breakthrough relevance 0.73 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 0.71 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.68 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Uncaged Fury relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.65 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.64 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.58 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Antagonize relevance 0.56 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Raze the Effigy relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Brute Strength relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.83 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Witch's Mark relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Kher Keep relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Labyrinth Champion: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.