Magus of the Bazaar
Played in 75 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Bant
All commanders (5)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 2.47 · 1.9% (28 of 1,476 decks)
- Katilda and Lier relevance 1.46 · 1.1% (9 of 818 decks)
- Barbara Wright // The Sixth Doctor relevance 1.21 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Shaun & Rebecca, Agents relevance 0.89 · 1.2% (3 of 257 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 0.50 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.54 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 1.43 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.33 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 1.33 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.31 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Windfall relevance 1.22 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.19 · 38.7% (29 of 75 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.18 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.14 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.12 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.09 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 1.08 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.06 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 1.03 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 1.02 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Kellan, the Kid relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.98 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.98 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.91 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.86 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.86 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Soaring Sandwing relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.78 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.77 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.76 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.54 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.33 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 1.33 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.31 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.19 · 38.7% (29 of 75 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.18 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.12 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.09 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.06 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 1.03 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Kellan, the Kid relevance 0.99 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.98 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.91 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.86 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.86 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Soaring Sandwing relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.83 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.77 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.76 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.74 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.70 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.70 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.66 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.65 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.64 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.64 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Waker of Waves relevance 0.63 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 0.62 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.98 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Greater Good relevance 1.43 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 1.08 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.71 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
All instants (4)
- Reclaim relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.14 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 1.02 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Windfall relevance 1.22 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.78 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.72 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 1.35 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.63 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
EDH data for Magus of the Bazaar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 75 real decks.