Curse of the Forsaken
Played in 210 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 2.94 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Mathas, Fiend Seeker relevance 2.18 · 2.2% (35 of 1,596 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 1.55 · 1.2% (22 of 1,905 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.34 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.36 · 61.4% (129 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 3.12 · 47.6% (100 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (88 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 2.64 · 54.3% (114 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 2.30 · 37.1% (78 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.22 · 37.6% (79 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 2.21 · 38.1% (80 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 2.17 · 32.4% (68 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 2.07 · 32.4% (68 of 210 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.05 · 34.8% (73 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 1.93 · 31.0% (65 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.93 · 69.5% (146 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.92 · 31.0% (65 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 1.91 · 28.6% (60 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 1.91 · 28.1% (59 of 210 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.85 · 28.6% (60 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 1.82 · 26.7% (56 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (55 of 210 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (55 of 210 decks)
- Curse of the Restless Dead relevance 1.66 · 24.8% (52 of 210 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.53 · 27.1% (57 of 210 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 1.34 · 21.4% (45 of 210 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.31 · 25.2% (53 of 210 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 1.16 · 21.9% (46 of 210 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (42 of 210 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.08 · 24.8% (52 of 210 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.07 · 27.1% (57 of 210 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 1.02 · 22.9% (48 of 210 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.01 · 20.5% (43 of 210 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.96 · 27.6% (58 of 210 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.31 · 25.2% (53 of 210 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 1.16 · 21.9% (46 of 210 decks)
- Death Kiss relevance 0.93 · 16.7% (35 of 210 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.92 · 36.7% (77 of 210 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.89 · 24.8% (52 of 210 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.86 · 12.9% (27 of 210 decks)
- Eriette of the Charmed Apple relevance 0.86 · 13.3% (28 of 210 decks)
- Combat Calligrapher relevance 0.84 · 19.0% (40 of 210 decks)
- Ondu Spiritdancer relevance 0.84 · 15.7% (33 of 210 decks)
- Karazikar, the Eye Tyrant relevance 0.74 · 21.4% (45 of 210 decks)
- Mangara, the Diplomat relevance 0.72 · 24.3% (51 of 210 decks)
- Calculating Lich relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (23 of 210 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.69 · 15.2% (32 of 210 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (21 of 210 decks)
- Slumbering Dragon relevance 0.67 · 10.5% (22 of 210 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.36 · 61.4% (129 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 3.12 · 47.6% (100 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (88 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 2.64 · 54.3% (114 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 2.30 · 37.1% (78 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.22 · 37.6% (79 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 2.21 · 38.1% (80 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 2.17 · 32.4% (68 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 2.07 · 32.4% (68 of 210 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.05 · 34.8% (73 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 1.93 · 31.0% (65 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.93 · 69.5% (146 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.92 · 31.0% (65 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 1.91 · 28.6% (60 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 1.91 · 28.1% (59 of 210 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.85 · 28.6% (60 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 1.82 · 26.7% (56 of 210 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (55 of 210 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (55 of 210 decks)
- Curse of the Restless Dead relevance 1.66 · 24.8% (52 of 210 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.53 · 27.1% (57 of 210 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 1.34 · 21.4% (45 of 210 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (42 of 210 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.08 · 24.8% (52 of 210 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.07 · 27.1% (57 of 210 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 1.02 · 22.9% (48 of 210 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.01 · 20.5% (43 of 210 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.96 · 27.6% (58 of 210 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 0.93 · 16.2% (34 of 210 decks)
- Righteous Cause relevance 0.84 · 14.8% (31 of 210 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (67 of 210 decks)
- Maddening Hex relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (47 of 210 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (29 of 210 decks)
- Grievous Wound relevance 0.67 · 12.4% (26 of 210 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (48 of 210 decks)
EDH data for Curse of the Forsaken: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 210 real decks.