Rise of the Hobgoblins
Played in 120 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
9.0% Five-Color
- Boros 879 · 65.8%
- Mardu 150 · 11.2%
- Five-Color 120 · 9.0%
- Naya 91 · 6.8%
- Jeskai 44 · 3.3%
- Other (9) 51 · 3.8%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Providence of Night relevance 2.01 · 4.4% (7 of 159 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Prosperous Partnership relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 1.84 · 35.8% (43 of 120 decks)
- General Ferrous Rokiric relevance 1.76 · 47.5% (57 of 120 decks)
- Balefire Liege relevance 1.71 · 25.0% (30 of 120 decks)
- Creakwood Liege relevance 1.51 · 22.5% (27 of 120 decks)
- Deathbringer Liege relevance 1.41 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Trace of Abundance relevance 1.33 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Blade Historian relevance 1.30 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Kirol, Attentive First-Year relevance 1.29 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Insidious Roots relevance 1.16 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Fallaji Wayfarer relevance 1.16 · 27.5% (33 of 120 decks)
- Assemble the Legion relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.07 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Vexing Shusher relevance 1.05 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 1.00 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 1.00 · 18.3% (22 of 120 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.99 · 28.3% (34 of 120 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.98 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Abuelo, Ancestral Echo relevance 0.98 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.95 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Sanar, Innovative First-Year relevance 0.93 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Warleader's Call relevance 0.93 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Widespread Thieving relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Jenson Carthalion, Druid Exile relevance 0.89 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (16 of 120 decks)
- Leyline of the Guildpact relevance 0.85 · 38.3% (46 of 120 decks)
- Xenagos, the Reveler relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (17 of 120 decks)
- Catharsis relevance 0.82 · 15.0% (18 of 120 decks)
- Manamorphose relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Knight of New Alara relevance 0.81 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 1.84 · 35.8% (43 of 120 decks)
- General Ferrous Rokiric relevance 1.76 · 47.5% (57 of 120 decks)
- Balefire Liege relevance 1.71 · 25.0% (30 of 120 decks)
- Creakwood Liege relevance 1.51 · 22.5% (27 of 120 decks)
- Deathbringer Liege relevance 1.41 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Blade Historian relevance 1.30 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Kirol, Attentive First-Year relevance 1.29 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Fallaji Wayfarer relevance 1.16 · 27.5% (33 of 120 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.07 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Vexing Shusher relevance 1.05 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 1.00 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.99 · 28.3% (34 of 120 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.98 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Abuelo, Ancestral Echo relevance 0.98 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Sanar, Innovative First-Year relevance 0.93 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Jenson Carthalion, Druid Exile relevance 0.89 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Catharsis relevance 0.82 · 15.0% (18 of 120 decks)
- Knight of New Alara relevance 0.81 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Gold-Forged Thopteryx relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Arabella, Abandoned Doll relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (15 of 120 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.77 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Divinity of Pride relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (13 of 120 decks)
- Spider Manifestation relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Mistmeadow Vanisher relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (13 of 120 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (14 of 120 decks)
- Brigid, Clachan's Heart // Brigid, Doun's Mind relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (15 of 120 decks)
- Lurrus of the Dream-Den relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (14 of 120 decks)
- Abigale, Eloquent First-Year relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (14 of 120 decks)
- Elas il-Kor, Sadistic Pilgrim relevance 0.68 · 12.5% (15 of 120 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (16 of 120 decks)
- Tome of the Guildpact relevance 0.79 · 18.3% (22 of 120 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Prosperous Partnership relevance 1.85 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Trace of Abundance relevance 1.33 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Insidious Roots relevance 1.16 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Assemble the Legion relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Warleader's Call relevance 0.93 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Widespread Thieving relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Leyline of the Guildpact relevance 0.85 · 38.3% (46 of 120 decks)
- Dovescape relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (13 of 120 decks)
All instants (4)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 1.00 · 18.3% (22 of 120 decks)
- Manamorphose relevance 0.82 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Master Warcraft relevance 0.73 · 10.8% (13 of 120 decks)
- Batwing Brume relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (14 of 120 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.95 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Safewright Quest relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (12 of 120 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Xenagos, the Reveler relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (17 of 120 decks)
- Invasion of New Phyrexia // Teferi Akosa of Zhalfir relevance 0.74 · 11.7% (14 of 120 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.91 · 17.5% (21 of 120 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.76 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
All lands (1)
- Pillar of the Paruns relevance 0.90 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
EDH data for Rise of the Hobgoblins: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 120 real decks.