Shield Sphere
Played in 500 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 5.53 · 30.5% (391 of 1,281 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 1.36 · 20.0% (4 of 20 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Assault Formation relevance 3.49 · 65.8% (329 of 500 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 3.42 · 62.2% (311 of 500 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 3.33 · 67.4% (337 of 500 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 3.30 · 65.4% (327 of 500 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.90 · 52.0% (260 of 500 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.77 · 53.6% (268 of 500 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 2.75 · 53.6% (268 of 500 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.68 · 47.4% (237 of 500 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.60 · 62.8% (314 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 2.52 · 40.6% (203 of 500 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 2.48 · 43.8% (219 of 500 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.46 · 41.8% (209 of 500 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.41 · 41.8% (209 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.34 · 41.4% (207 of 500 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 2.29 · 40.8% (204 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 2.25 · 48.0% (240 of 500 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.25 · 57.2% (286 of 500 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.25 · 45.6% (228 of 500 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 2.22 · 37.2% (186 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.21 · 40.2% (201 of 500 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.17 · 52.8% (264 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.13 · 33.4% (167 of 500 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 2.07 · 63.4% (317 of 500 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 1.98 · 36.0% (180 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.90 · 32.4% (162 of 500 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.85 · 32.0% (160 of 500 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 1.81 · 28.4% (142 of 500 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.81 · 37.4% (187 of 500 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.80 · 37.6% (188 of 500 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.79 · 38.8% (194 of 500 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 3.42 · 62.2% (311 of 500 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 3.33 · 67.4% (337 of 500 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 3.30 · 65.4% (327 of 500 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.90 · 52.0% (260 of 500 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.77 · 53.6% (268 of 500 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 2.75 · 53.6% (268 of 500 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.68 · 47.4% (237 of 500 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.60 · 62.8% (314 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 2.52 · 40.6% (203 of 500 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 2.48 · 43.8% (219 of 500 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.46 · 41.8% (209 of 500 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.41 · 41.8% (209 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.34 · 41.4% (207 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 2.25 · 48.0% (240 of 500 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.25 · 57.2% (286 of 500 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.25 · 45.6% (228 of 500 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 2.22 · 37.2% (186 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.21 · 40.2% (201 of 500 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.17 · 52.8% (264 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.13 · 33.4% (167 of 500 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.90 · 32.4% (162 of 500 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.85 · 32.0% (160 of 500 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 1.81 · 28.4% (142 of 500 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.81 · 37.4% (187 of 500 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.80 · 37.6% (188 of 500 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.79 · 38.8% (194 of 500 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 1.69 · 49.6% (248 of 500 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 1.69 · 48.8% (244 of 500 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.62 · 25.8% (129 of 500 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.56 · 26.6% (133 of 500 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 1.42 · 23.6% (118 of 500 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 1.28 · 37.2% (186 of 500 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 1.27 · 20.2% (101 of 500 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.19 · 22.8% (114 of 500 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 1.18 · 41.2% (206 of 500 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 1.76 · 28.8% (144 of 500 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 1.23 · 19.6% (98 of 500 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 1.22 · 20.6% (103 of 500 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 1.20 · 24.6% (123 of 500 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assault Formation relevance 3.49 · 65.8% (329 of 500 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 2.29 · 40.8% (204 of 500 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 2.07 · 63.4% (317 of 500 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.36 · 38.8% (194 of 500 decks)
All instants (3)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.73 · 28.6% (143 of 500 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 1.36 · 25.8% (129 of 500 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.27 · 21.4% (107 of 500 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 1.98 · 36.0% (180 of 500 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.64 · 44.2% (221 of 500 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Access Tunnel relevance 2.12 · 44.8% (224 of 500 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.30 · 25.6% (128 of 500 decks)
EDH data for Shield Sphere: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 500 real decks.