Vivid Meadow
Played in 639 Esper decks
526+6+9+5+6+7+17+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Sen Triplets 3.4% of decks
Sen Triplets 3.4% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Sengir, the Dark Baron 17.2% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Sengir, the Dark Baron 17.2% of decks
Zur the Enchanter 1.0% of decks
Zur the Enchanter 1.0% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ravos, Soultender 8.1% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ravos, Soultender 8.1% of decks
Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ravos, Soultender 1.5% of decks
Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ravos, Soultender 1.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Darksteel Ingot 20.8% of decks
Darksteel Ingot 20.8% of decks
Unsubstantiate 12.2% of decks
Unsubstantiate 12.2% of decks
Prismatic Lens 11.4% of decks
Prismatic Lens 11.4% of decks
Negate 31.0% of decks
Negate 31.0% of decks
Gonti, Lord of Luxury 12.8% of decks
Gonti, Lord of Luxury 12.8% of decks
Mana Geode 10.6% of decks
Mana Geode 10.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Sen Triplets relevance 2.60 · 3.4% (150 of 4,371 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 1.46 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Zur the Enchanter relevance 1.46 · 1.0% (101 of 10,011 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.93 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.26 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.92 · 20.8% (133 of 639 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.71 · 12.2% (78 of 639 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.61 · 11.4% (73 of 639 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.59 · 31.0% (198 of 639 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (82 of 639 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (164 of 639 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (75 of 639 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (87 of 639 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (96 of 639 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (84 of 639 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (53 of 639 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.49 · 36.0% (230 of 639 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.49 · 34.4% (220 of 639 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (73 of 639 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (58 of 639 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (49 of 639 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (59 of 639 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (57 of 639 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (120 of 639 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (70 of 639 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (55 of 639 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
- Crabomination relevance 0.46 · 7.2% (46 of 639 decks)
- Celestial Dawn relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (49 of 639 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (82 of 639 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (87 of 639 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (96 of 639 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (84 of 639 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (59 of 639 decks)
- Crabomination relevance 0.46 · 7.2% (46 of 639 decks)
All artifacts (9)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.92 · 20.8% (133 of 639 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.61 · 11.4% (73 of 639 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (164 of 639 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (53 of 639 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.49 · 36.0% (230 of 639 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.49 · 34.4% (220 of 639 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.49 · 11.4% (73 of 639 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (49 of 639 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (75 of 639 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (58 of 639 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (70 of 639 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
- Celestial Dawn relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (49 of 639 decks)
All instants (6)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.71 · 12.2% (78 of 639 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.59 · 31.0% (198 of 639 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (57 of 639 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (120 of 639 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (55 of 639 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (68 of 639 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.81 · 27.4% (175 of 639 decks)
- Jwar Isle Refuge relevance 0.73 · 16.3% (104 of 639 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.72 · 24.3% (155 of 639 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.71 · 23.8% (152 of 639 decks)
- Sejiri Refuge relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (91 of 639 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.49 · 25.2% (161 of 639 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (52 of 639 decks)
All lands (17)
- Vivid Creek relevance 4.34 · 74.8% (478 of 639 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 3.83 · 62.8% (401 of 639 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (104 of 639 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.68 · 33.5% (214 of 639 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.65 · 19.2% (123 of 639 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (118 of 639 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (93 of 639 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (93 of 639 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.62 · 18.0% (115 of 639 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 39.9% (255 of 639 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (169 of 639 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (160 of 639 decks)
- Meandering River relevance 0.51 · 9.5% (61 of 639 decks)
- Esper Panorama relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (84 of 639 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (131 of 639 decks)
- Forsaken Sanctuary relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (59 of 639 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.46 · 16.6% (106 of 639 decks)
EDH data for Vivid Meadow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 639 real decks.














































