Color Identity Spread
47.9% Golgari
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (23)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 3.13 · 11.2% (2,286 of 20,476 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.72 · 8.6% (1,812 of 20,986 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 2.50 · 14.4% (268 of 1,867 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 1.35 · 6.2% (76 of 1,231 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.20 · 6.3% (46 of 733 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.74 · 8.2% (7 of 85 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.69 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.65 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Haunted One relevance 0.38 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (16 of 1,229 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Master Chef relevance 0.28 · 1.0% (15 of 1,449 decks)
- Storrev, Devkarin Lich relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (3 of 113 decks)
- Trystan, Callous Cultivator // Trystan, Penitent Culler relevance 0.24 · 1.1% (9 of 805 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Haunted One relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Vhati il-Dal relevance 0.17 · 1.4% (3 of 217 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (2 of 126 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.00 · 74.6% (3,464 of 4,642 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.98 · 70.6% (3,279 of 4,642 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.94 · 86.9% (4,034 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.91 · 94.9% (4,403 of 4,642 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.89 · 78.2% (3,628 of 4,642 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.87 · 91.5% (4,247 of 4,642 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.83 · 72.5% (3,366 of 4,642 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.83 · 68.4% (3,173 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.79 · 62.1% (2,883 of 4,642 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.77 · 57.9% (2,687 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.73 · 73.1% (3,394 of 4,642 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.53 · 74.5% (3,458 of 4,642 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.46 · 41.3% (1,917 of 4,642 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.44 · 44.0% (2,043 of 4,642 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.43 · 64.8% (3,006 of 4,642 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.42 · 42.7% (1,984 of 4,642 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.34 · 39.6% (1,836 of 4,642 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 1.34 · 48.4% (2,249 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.33 · 45.3% (2,101 of 4,642 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.30 · 38.8% (1,803 of 4,642 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.29 · 45.4% (2,106 of 4,642 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.28 · 49.3% (2,290 of 4,642 decks)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 1.27 · 48.0% (2,227 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.26 · 47.6% (2,208 of 4,642 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.24 · 62.6% (2,908 of 4,642 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.20 · 70.3% (3,263 of 4,642 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.18 · 48.3% (2,241 of 4,642 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.18 · 34.1% (1,581 of 4,642 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.15 · 39.4% (1,828 of 4,642 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.12 · 41.5% (1,927 of 4,642 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.00 · 74.6% (3,464 of 4,642 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.98 · 70.6% (3,279 of 4,642 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.94 · 86.9% (4,034 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.91 · 94.9% (4,403 of 4,642 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.89 · 78.2% (3,628 of 4,642 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.87 · 91.5% (4,247 of 4,642 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.83 · 72.5% (3,366 of 4,642 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.83 · 68.4% (3,173 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.79 · 62.1% (2,883 of 4,642 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.77 · 57.9% (2,687 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.73 · 73.1% (3,394 of 4,642 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.53 · 74.5% (3,458 of 4,642 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.46 · 41.3% (1,917 of 4,642 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.43 · 64.8% (3,006 of 4,642 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.42 · 42.7% (1,984 of 4,642 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.34 · 39.6% (1,836 of 4,642 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 1.34 · 48.4% (2,249 of 4,642 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.33 · 45.3% (2,101 of 4,642 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.30 · 38.8% (1,803 of 4,642 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.29 · 45.4% (2,106 of 4,642 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.24 · 62.6% (2,908 of 4,642 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.20 · 70.3% (3,263 of 4,642 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.18 · 48.3% (2,241 of 4,642 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.18 · 34.1% (1,581 of 4,642 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.15 · 39.4% (1,828 of 4,642 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.10 · 40.8% (1,893 of 4,642 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.07 · 35.1% (1,628 of 4,642 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.06 · 39.9% (1,852 of 4,642 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.05 · 27.6% (1,283 of 4,642 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.97 · 31.3% (1,454 of 4,642 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.97 · 51.3% (2,383 of 4,642 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.95 · 56.5% (2,623 of 4,642 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.94 · 35.0% (1,624 of 4,642 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.44 · 44.0% (2,043 of 4,642 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 1.10 · 27.1% (1,256 of 4,642 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Guardian Project relevance 1.04 · 37.7% (1,748 of 4,642 decks)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 1.03 · 36.7% (1,703 of 4,642 decks)
All instants (3)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.28 · 49.3% (2,290 of 4,642 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.12 · 41.5% (1,927 of 4,642 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.97 · 42.3% (1,963 of 4,642 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.26 · 47.6% (2,208 of 4,642 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 1.05 · 33.0% (1,534 of 4,642 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 1.01 · 43.5% (2,020 of 4,642 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 1.27 · 48.0% (2,227 of 4,642 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.96 · 32.6% (1,514 of 4,642 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.87 · 64.5% (2,993 of 4,642 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 1.48 · 54.0% (2,505 of 4,642 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.05 · 74.5% (3,456 of 4,642 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 1.78 · 62.3% (2,892 of 4,642 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 1.25 · 54.1% (2,512 of 4,642 decks)
EDH data for Eladamri, Lord of Leaves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,642 real decks.