Iron Will
Played in 18 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (27)
- Solidarity relevance 2.61 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.33 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 2.30 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.12 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 2.06 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.98 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.95 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.91 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.90 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Bar the Door relevance 1.88 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.86 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.86 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.83 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.80 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 1.70 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.67 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.60 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.55 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.55 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.54 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.53 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.44 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.41 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.28 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.12 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.98 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.95 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.91 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.90 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.86 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.86 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.83 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.80 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 1.70 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.67 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.55 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.55 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.54 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.53 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.44 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.28 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 2.06 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Stoneskin relevance 2.30 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.60 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
All instants (3)
- Solidarity relevance 2.61 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.33 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Bar the Door relevance 1.88 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.41 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
EDH data for Iron Will: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 18 real decks.