War Effort
Played in 233 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Gruul
930+13+9+16+2+2+1+3+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Samut, Vizier of Naktamun relevance 1.94 · 3.1% (21 of 674 decks)
- Gimli, Mournful Avenger relevance 1.52 · 2.3% (13 of 557 decks)
- Deathleaper, Terror Weapon relevance 0.97 · 1.5% (6 of 400 decks)
- Master Chef // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.52 · 1.3% (2 of 155 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Guild Artisan relevance 0.48 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.39 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.37 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Berserkers' Onslaught relevance 1.07 · 47.6% (111 of 233 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 1.02 · 35.6% (83 of 233 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.99 · 33.5% (78 of 233 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.97 · 43.3% (101 of 233 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.97 · 36.1% (84 of 233 decks)
- Sunbird's Invocation relevance 0.96 · 39.1% (91 of 233 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.92 · 29.6% (69 of 233 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 0.89 · 34.8% (81 of 233 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.88 · 31.8% (74 of 233 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (75 of 233 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.83 · 31.8% (74 of 233 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.79 · 32.2% (75 of 233 decks)
- Wildsear, Scouring Maw relevance 0.78 · 28.3% (66 of 233 decks)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.77 · 30.9% (72 of 233 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.76 · 36.9% (86 of 233 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 0.74 · 24.0% (56 of 233 decks)
- Rolling Hamsphere relevance 0.71 · 23.6% (55 of 233 decks)
- Pyreswipe Hawk relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (47 of 233 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.66 · 21.0% (49 of 233 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.64 · 21.9% (51 of 233 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.64 · 43.8% (102 of 233 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (41 of 233 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.63 · 33.9% (79 of 233 decks)
- Infantry Shield relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (26 of 233 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.60 · 24.5% (57 of 233 decks)
- Urabrask's Forge relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (28 of 233 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (22 of 233 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.57 · 17.6% (41 of 233 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.56 · 34.8% (81 of 233 decks)
- Teapot Slinger relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (39 of 233 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 0.89 · 34.8% (81 of 233 decks)
- Wildsear, Scouring Maw relevance 0.78 · 28.3% (66 of 233 decks)
- Trailtracker Scout relevance 0.77 · 30.9% (72 of 233 decks)
- Pyreswipe Hawk relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (47 of 233 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.60 · 24.5% (57 of 233 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.57 · 17.6% (41 of 233 decks)
- Teapot Slinger relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (39 of 233 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.56 · 17.6% (41 of 233 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.55 · 19.7% (46 of 233 decks)
- Loyal Apprentice relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (30 of 233 decks)
- Enduring Courage relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (39 of 233 decks)
- Stampede Surfer relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (22 of 233 decks)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot relevance 0.51 · 8.2% (19 of 233 decks)
All artifacts (9)
- Hedron Archive relevance 1.02 · 35.6% (83 of 233 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.97 · 36.1% (84 of 233 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.88 · 31.8% (74 of 233 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.79 · 32.2% (75 of 233 decks)
- Rolling Hamsphere relevance 0.71 · 23.6% (55 of 233 decks)
- Infantry Shield relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (26 of 233 decks)
- Urabrask's Forge relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (28 of 233 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.55 · 20.2% (47 of 233 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (32 of 233 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Berserkers' Onslaught relevance 1.07 · 47.6% (111 of 233 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.99 · 33.5% (78 of 233 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.97 · 43.3% (101 of 233 decks)
- Sunbird's Invocation relevance 0.96 · 39.1% (91 of 233 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.92 · 29.6% (69 of 233 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.85 · 32.2% (75 of 233 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.83 · 31.8% (74 of 233 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.76 · 36.9% (86 of 233 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 0.74 · 24.0% (56 of 233 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.66 · 21.0% (49 of 233 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.64 · 21.9% (51 of 233 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.64 · 43.8% (102 of 233 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (41 of 233 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (22 of 233 decks)
- Collective Inferno relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (36 of 233 decks)
- Street Riot relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (28 of 233 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.54 · 22.7% (53 of 233 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (60 of 233 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.55 · 40.3% (94 of 233 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.54 · 37.3% (87 of 233 decks)
All lands (4)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.61 · 36.5% (85 of 233 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.58 · 47.2% (110 of 233 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.54 · 38.2% (89 of 233 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (55 of 233 decks)
EDH data for War Effort: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 233 real decks.





























































