Chomping Changeling
Played in 14,110 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (23)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.15 · 46.7% (2,342 of 5,012 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 3.05 · 30.5% (8,368 of 27,396 decks)
- Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 2.91 · 40.4% (2,046 of 5,067 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.65 · 4.9% (361 of 7,335 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.44 · 27.3% (3 of 11 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 0.30 · 2.0% (264 of 12,880 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (95 of 3,883 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (24 of 659 decks)
- Nashi, Moon's Legacy relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (19 of 637 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (32 of 2,055 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (7 of 370 decks)
- Kotis, Sibsig Champion relevance 0.08 · 1.2% (8 of 648 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (3 of 182 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.05 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.05 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.05 · 1.6% (2 of 127 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.04 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.04 · 1.2% (2 of 170 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.02 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 1.22 · 37.6% (5,306 of 14,110 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 1.09 · 38.5% (5,432 of 14,110 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (4,875 of 14,110 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (5,214 of 14,110 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.97 · 36.8% (5,194 of 14,110 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.97 · 36.5% (5,147 of 14,110 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.96 · 34.1% (4,814 of 14,110 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.95 · 32.6% (4,598 of 14,110 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.93 · 31.3% (4,419 of 14,110 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.93 · 39.9% (5,631 of 14,110 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.92 · 30.7% (4,330 of 14,110 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.87 · 30.7% (4,338 of 14,110 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.87 · 30.0% (4,236 of 14,110 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (4,134 of 14,110 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.86 · 31.1% (4,391 of 14,110 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.84 · 30.9% (4,363 of 14,110 decks)
- Uchuulon relevance 0.83 · 24.1% (3,405 of 14,110 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.82 · 33.3% (4,705 of 14,110 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.82 · 26.9% (3,796 of 14,110 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.82 · 22.3% (3,146 of 14,110 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.81 · 25.2% (3,550 of 14,110 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.80 · 25.5% (3,597 of 14,110 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.79 · 27.5% (3,875 of 14,110 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (4,144 of 14,110 decks)
- Graveshifter relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (2,828 of 14,110 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (3,373 of 14,110 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.77 · 20.8% (2,929 of 14,110 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (4,783 of 14,110 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (3,237 of 14,110 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.75 · 24.0% (3,382 of 14,110 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 1.22 · 37.6% (5,306 of 14,110 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (4,875 of 14,110 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.97 · 36.8% (5,194 of 14,110 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.97 · 36.5% (5,147 of 14,110 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.96 · 34.1% (4,814 of 14,110 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.95 · 32.6% (4,598 of 14,110 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.93 · 31.3% (4,419 of 14,110 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.93 · 39.9% (5,631 of 14,110 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.87 · 30.7% (4,338 of 14,110 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.87 · 30.0% (4,236 of 14,110 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (4,134 of 14,110 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.86 · 31.1% (4,391 of 14,110 decks)
- Uchuulon relevance 0.83 · 24.1% (3,405 of 14,110 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.82 · 33.3% (4,705 of 14,110 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.82 · 26.9% (3,796 of 14,110 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.82 · 22.3% (3,146 of 14,110 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.80 · 25.5% (3,597 of 14,110 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.79 · 27.5% (3,875 of 14,110 decks)
- Graveshifter relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (2,828 of 14,110 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (3,373 of 14,110 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (4,783 of 14,110 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (3,237 of 14,110 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.75 · 24.0% (3,382 of 14,110 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.74 · 50.7% (7,147 of 14,110 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.72 · 31.8% (4,487 of 14,110 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.72 · 31.0% (4,378 of 14,110 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.72 · 40.8% (5,753 of 14,110 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.71 · 23.0% (3,249 of 14,110 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.70 · 28.3% (3,997 of 14,110 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.68 · 30.7% (4,327 of 14,110 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.67 · 25.2% (3,550 of 14,110 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.67 · 28.5% (4,016 of 14,110 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.65 · 28.3% (3,995 of 14,110 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.64 · 21.9% (3,085 of 14,110 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.63 · 17.5% (2,464 of 14,110 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.92 · 30.7% (4,330 of 14,110 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.77 · 20.8% (2,929 of 14,110 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 1.09 · 38.5% (5,432 of 14,110 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.84 · 30.9% (4,363 of 14,110 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (4,144 of 14,110 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.72 · 26.0% (3,669 of 14,110 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (5,214 of 14,110 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.81 · 25.2% (3,550 of 14,110 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.72 · 22.3% (3,144 of 14,110 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.70 · 19.4% (2,744 of 14,110 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.68 · 20.8% (2,933 of 14,110 decks)
- Bloodline Bidding relevance 0.66 · 21.1% (2,976 of 14,110 decks)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.65 · 18.3% (2,580 of 14,110 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.63 · 44.2% (6,236 of 14,110 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.72 · 23.9% (3,369 of 14,110 decks)
EDH data for Chomping Changeling: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 14,110 real decks.