Flourishing Hunter
Played in 129 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (2)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 1.37 · 1.9% (7 of 372 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.66 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.59 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.57 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Fractal Mascot relevance 0.53 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.47 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (15 of 129 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (8 of 129 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.66 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (18 of 129 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.59 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.57 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Fractal Mascot relevance 0.53 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.47 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (8 of 129 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Raucous Audience relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (8 of 129 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.40 · 31.0% (40 of 129 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.40 · 11.6% (15 of 129 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.66 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (8 of 129 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.42 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
All instants (7)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (10 of 129 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (9 of 129 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (15 of 129 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (14 of 129 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (11 of 129 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (8 of 129 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (12 of 129 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (13 of 129 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.38 · 12.4% (16 of 129 decks)
All lands (7)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.85 · 42.6% (55 of 129 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.68 · 17.8% (23 of 129 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.63 · 16.3% (21 of 129 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 36.4% (47 of 129 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.40 · 20.2% (26 of 129 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (30 of 129 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.39 · 14.7% (19 of 129 decks)
EDH data for Flourishing Hunter: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 129 real decks.