Charforger
Played in 70 Five-Color decks
1
All commanders (1)
- Horde of Notions relevance 2.66 · 1.5% (23 of 1,504 decks)
30
All most relevant (30)
- Vat of Rebirth relevance 2.14 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.93 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 1.88 · 30.0% (21 of 70 decks)
- Leyline Prowler relevance 1.86 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.85 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 1.82 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Grim Giganotosaurus relevance 1.76 · 27.1% (19 of 70 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 1.75 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.64 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- Brimaz, Blight of Oreskos relevance 1.44 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 1.37 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 1.36 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Catalyst Elemental relevance 1.36 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Glissa, Herald of Predation relevance 1.24 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.23 · 27.1% (19 of 70 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 1.21 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- The Lion-Turtle relevance 1.17 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.16 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 1.16 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.14 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 1.01 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Grafted Butcher relevance 0.98 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 0.96 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.94 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- White Sun's Twilight relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Moonglove Changeling relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Vishgraz, the Doomhive relevance 0.88 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
39
All creatures (39)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 1.93 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 1.88 · 30.0% (21 of 70 decks)
- Leyline Prowler relevance 1.86 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.85 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 1.82 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Grim Giganotosaurus relevance 1.76 · 27.1% (19 of 70 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 1.75 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.64 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- Brimaz, Blight of Oreskos relevance 1.44 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 1.37 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 1.36 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Catalyst Elemental relevance 1.36 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Glissa, Herald of Predation relevance 1.24 · 20.0% (14 of 70 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.23 · 27.1% (19 of 70 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 1.21 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.19 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- The Lion-Turtle relevance 1.17 · 21.4% (15 of 70 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.16 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 1.16 · 24.3% (17 of 70 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.14 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Grafted Butcher relevance 0.98 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 0.96 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.94 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Moonglove Changeling relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Vishgraz, the Doomhive relevance 0.88 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Elesh Norn // The Argent Etchings relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Ghostly Changeling relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Solphim, Mayhem Dominus relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
- Urabrask the Hidden relevance 0.81 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Mondrak, Glory Dominus relevance 0.79 · 18.6% (13 of 70 decks)
- Barkform Harvester relevance 0.77 · 14.3% (10 of 70 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (13 of 70 decks)
- Old Hob, Alleycat Blues relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
- Atraxa, Praetors' Voice relevance 0.71 · 18.6% (13 of 70 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.71 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
2
All artifacts (2)
- Vat of Rebirth relevance 2.14 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
- Phyrexian Atlas relevance 0.78 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
2
All instants (2)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 1.01 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.77 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
3
All sorceries (3)
- White Sun's Twilight relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (8 of 70 decks)
1
All planeswalkers (1)
- Lukka, Bound to Ruin relevance 0.87 · 12.9% (9 of 70 decks)
3
All utility lands (3)
- The Seedcore relevance 1.39 · 22.9% (16 of 70 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.97 · 15.7% (11 of 70 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.78 · 17.1% (12 of 70 decks)
EDH data for Charforger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 70 real decks.






















