Culmination of Studies
Played in 1,456 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
83.4% Izzet
- Izzet 1,456 · 83.4%
- Grixis 89 · 5.1%
- Jeskai 74 · 4.2%
- Temur 69 · 4.0%
- Five-Color 35 · 2.0%
- Other (6) 22 · 1.3%
All commanders (29)
- Galazeth Prismari relevance 2.34 · 6.0% (164 of 2,742 decks)
- Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot relevance 1.92 · 5.3% (80 of 1,521 decks)
- Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph relevance 1.59 · 2.2% (216 of 9,813 decks)
- Zaffai, Thunder Conductor relevance 1.50 · 4.3% (41 of 958 decks)
- Magnus the Red relevance 1.20 · 2.0% (70 of 3,500 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 1.19 · 2.6% (40 of 1,557 decks)
- Kaza, Roil Chaser relevance 1.08 · 2.8% (24 of 847 decks)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 1.03 · 1.8% (50 of 2,847 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 0.98 · 1.9% (35 of 1,849 decks)
- Tibor and Lumia relevance 0.96 · 3.9% (11 of 282 decks)
- Rootha, Mercurial Artist relevance 0.75 · 3.3% (7 of 211 decks)
- Will Kenrith // Rowan Kenrith relevance 0.73 · 2.2% (11 of 506 decks)
- Breeches, the Blastmaker relevance 0.71 · 1.8% (13 of 707 decks)
- Johann, Apprentice Sorcerer relevance 0.70 · 4.1% (5 of 123 decks)
- Ryan Sinclair // The Fifteenth Doctor relevance 0.67 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Baral and Kari Zev relevance 0.66 · 2.0% (9 of 441 decks)
- Keranos, God of Storms relevance 0.62 · 1.8% (9 of 489 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.55 · 1.1% (15 of 1,379 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (9 of 719 decks)
- Iceman and Firestar relevance 0.49 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 0.44 · 1.1% (8 of 728 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.42 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains // Raphael, the Muscle relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (3 of 185 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Clan Crafter relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Belligerent relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (3 of 201 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Epic Experiment relevance 0.67 · 20.9% (304 of 1,456 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 35.6% (519 of 1,456 decks)
- Electrolyze relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (250 of 1,456 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.58 · 20.9% (305 of 1,456 decks)
- Expansion // Explosion relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (279 of 1,456 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (229 of 1,456 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (198 of 1,456 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.54 · 22.9% (334 of 1,456 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (246 of 1,456 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (258 of 1,456 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (158 of 1,456 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.49 · 20.0% (291 of 1,456 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.48 · 34.1% (496 of 1,456 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (252 of 1,456 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.46 · 15.0% (218 of 1,456 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (256 of 1,456 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.46 · 33.6% (489 of 1,456 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (146 of 1,456 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (231 of 1,456 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (207 of 1,456 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.44 · 16.3% (238 of 1,456 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (131 of 1,456 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (188 of 1,456 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.43 · 34.0% (495 of 1,456 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (218 of 1,456 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (220 of 1,456 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.42 · 22.3% (325 of 1,456 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (291 of 1,456 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.41 · 17.9% (261 of 1,456 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (170 of 1,456 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.48 · 34.1% (496 of 1,456 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (231 of 1,456 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (218 of 1,456 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (220 of 1,456 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (291 of 1,456 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.41 · 17.9% (261 of 1,456 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.40 · 22.0% (321 of 1,456 decks)
- Kessig Flamebreather relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (214 of 1,456 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (313 of 1,456 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Sorcerer Class relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (192 of 1,456 decks)
All instants (19)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 35.6% (519 of 1,456 decks)
- Electrolyze relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (250 of 1,456 decks)
- Expansion // Explosion relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (279 of 1,456 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (229 of 1,456 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (246 of 1,456 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (158 of 1,456 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (252 of 1,456 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (256 of 1,456 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (146 of 1,456 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.44 · 16.3% (238 of 1,456 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (188 of 1,456 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.43 · 34.0% (495 of 1,456 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.42 · 22.3% (325 of 1,456 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 0.40 · 12.6% (184 of 1,456 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (186 of 1,456 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (277 of 1,456 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (144 of 1,456 decks)
- Traumatic Critique relevance 0.38 · 12.2% (177 of 1,456 decks)
- Mindswipe relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (113 of 1,456 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Epic Experiment relevance 0.67 · 20.9% (304 of 1,456 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.58 · 20.9% (305 of 1,456 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (198 of 1,456 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.54 · 22.9% (334 of 1,456 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (258 of 1,456 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.49 · 20.0% (291 of 1,456 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.46 · 15.0% (218 of 1,456 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.46 · 33.6% (489 of 1,456 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (207 of 1,456 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (131 of 1,456 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (170 of 1,456 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (171 of 1,456 decks)
- Blazing Volley relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (163 of 1,456 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.39 · 14.7% (214 of 1,456 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (101 of 1,456 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Prismari Campus relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (213 of 1,456 decks)
All lands (5)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.44 · 22.0% (320 of 1,456 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.43 · 13.9% (202 of 1,456 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.43 · 32.6% (474 of 1,456 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 18.7% (272 of 1,456 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (406 of 1,456 decks)
EDH data for Culmination of Studies: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,456 real decks.