Lunar Rejection
Played in 45 Azorius decks
130+14+2+3+21+10+
Color Identity Spread
36.3% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Lu Xun, Scholar General 64.4% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 64.4% of decks
Looter il-Kor 73.3% of decks
Looter il-Kor 73.3% of decks
Library Larcenist 64.4% of decks
Library Larcenist 64.4% of decks
Library of Lat-Nam 62.2% of decks
Library of Lat-Nam 62.2% of decks
Mentor's Guidance 62.2% of decks
Mentor's Guidance 62.2% of decks
Call to Heel 60.0% of decks
Call to Heel 60.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.38 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 4.37 · 73.3% (33 of 45 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 4.34 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 4.23 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 4.10 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 4.06 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.05 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 3.98 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 3.97 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 3.96 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 3.95 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 3.92 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Bandage relevance 3.89 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 3.88 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Lofty Dreams relevance 3.87 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 3.86 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Medomai's Prophecy relevance 3.81 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Market Gnome relevance 3.81 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 3.79 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 3.78 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 3.77 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Arrester's Admonition relevance 3.77 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 3.76 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 3.76 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 3.75 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 3.73 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 3.72 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 3.72 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 3.72 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Contradict relevance 3.68 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.38 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 4.37 · 73.3% (33 of 45 decks)
- Library Larcenist relevance 4.34 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 3.96 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 3.92 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Market Gnome relevance 3.81 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 3.75 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 3.72 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 3.66 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Jushi Apprentice // Tomoya the Revealer relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Leonardo da Vinci relevance 3.59 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 3.58 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 3.56 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 3.73 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Mnemonic Sphere relevance 3.58 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Lofty Dreams relevance 3.87 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Medomai's Prophecy relevance 3.81 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 3.77 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
All instants (21)
- Call to Heel relevance 4.06 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 3.98 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 3.97 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 3.95 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Bandage relevance 3.89 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 3.88 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 3.86 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Arrester's Admonition relevance 3.77 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 3.76 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 3.76 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 3.72 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Contradict relevance 3.68 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 3.66 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 3.64 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 3.63 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 3.62 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 3.62 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 3.60 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 3.59 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 3.58 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- I Am Iron Man relevance 3.56 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 4.23 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 4.10 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.05 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 3.79 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 3.78 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 3.72 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 3.68 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Jace's Triumph relevance 3.66 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Healing Hands relevance 3.62 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 3.60 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
EDH data for Lunar Rejection: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 45 real decks.













































