Greater Sandwurm
Played in 207 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
730+45+1+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 2.53 · 2.9% (53 of 1,839 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.66 · 1.6% (22 of 1,351 decks)
- Hans Eriksson relevance 0.84 · 1.1% (5 of 441 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.40 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.39 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Stangg relevance 0.37 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.32 · 23.7% (49 of 207 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.28 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.22 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.21 · 31.9% (66 of 207 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.18 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.17 · 28.0% (58 of 207 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.16 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 1.12 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.11 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.11 · 20.8% (43 of 207 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 1.07 · 24.2% (50 of 207 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.04 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 1.04 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 0.97 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.96 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.91 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.83 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.79 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.71 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.32 · 23.7% (49 of 207 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.28 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.22 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.21 · 31.9% (66 of 207 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.18 · 21.3% (44 of 207 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.17 · 28.0% (58 of 207 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.16 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 1.12 · 22.2% (46 of 207 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.11 · 21.7% (45 of 207 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.11 · 20.8% (43 of 207 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 1.07 · 24.2% (50 of 207 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.04 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 1.04 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 0.97 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.96 · 19.8% (41 of 207 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.91 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.83 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (32 of 207 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.79 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (27 of 207 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.71 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (26 of 207 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 0.65 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Skyscythe Engulfer relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (25 of 207 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.60 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (20 of 207 decks)
- Hill Gigas relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (21 of 207 decks)
- Rapacious One relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (22 of 207 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.51 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.49 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (29 of 207 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (23 of 207 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (17 of 207 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (18 of 207 decks)
All lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.94 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.64 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 35.3% (73 of 207 decks)
EDH data for Greater Sandwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 207 real decks.


































