Color Identity Spread
60.9% Mardu
- Mardu 15,745 · 60.9%
- Rakdos 5,490 · 21.2%
- Grixis 2,071 · 8.0%
- Jund 2,045 · 7.9%
- Other (12) 509 · 2.0%
All commanders (22)
- Kaalia of the Vast relevance 4.04 · 56.8% (13,738 of 24,200 decks)
- Alesha, Who Smiles at Death relevance 2.40 · 36.5% (929 of 2,546 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.10 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Kaalia, Zenith Seeker relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (58 of 535 decks)
- Queen Marchesa relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (290 of 12,495 decks)
- Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (70 of 2,835 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Radiant, Serra Archangel relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Terra, Herald of Hope relevance 0.13 · 1.0% (159 of 15,883 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Tsagan, Raider Warlord relevance 0.10 · 1.2% (28 of 2,366 decks)
- Zurgo Helmsmasher relevance 0.10 · 1.1% (30 of 2,668 decks)
- Tariel, Reckoner of Souls relevance 0.08 · 1.2% (11 of 913 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel relevance 0.07 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.07 · 1.3% (6 of 458 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Snapdax, Apex of the Hunt relevance 0.06 · 1.0% (7 of 675 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.04 · 1.6% (2 of 129 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.03 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.03 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.02 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 1.86 · 72.2% (11,372 of 15,745 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 1.69 · 66.5% (10,476 of 15,745 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 1.60 · 55.1% (8,673 of 15,745 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.56 · 75.8% (11,929 of 15,745 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 1.52 · 53.9% (8,491 of 15,745 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.50 · 51.9% (8,174 of 15,745 decks)
- Lord of the Void relevance 1.46 · 46.0% (7,249 of 15,745 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 1.44 · 54.0% (8,497 of 15,745 decks)
- Kaalia, Zenith Seeker relevance 1.41 · 46.3% (7,286 of 15,745 decks)
- Angel of Despair relevance 1.31 · 42.9% (6,752 of 15,745 decks)
- Rakdos, Patron of Chaos relevance 1.29 · 42.3% (6,662 of 15,745 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 1.28 · 40.7% (6,405 of 15,745 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 1.27 · 43.3% (6,812 of 15,745 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 1.26 · 74.5% (11,724 of 15,745 decks)
- Archfiend of Despair relevance 1.25 · 37.8% (5,955 of 15,745 decks)
- Dragon Tempest relevance 1.22 · 38.2% (6,014 of 15,745 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 1.17 · 40.1% (6,312 of 15,745 decks)
- Reya Dawnbringer relevance 1.15 · 35.9% (5,645 of 15,745 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 1.15 · 36.4% (5,731 of 15,745 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 1.14 · 34.9% (5,499 of 15,745 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 1.10 · 41.9% (6,600 of 15,745 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 1.07 · 39.5% (6,215 of 15,745 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.98 · 27.4% (4,314 of 15,745 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.98 · 30.3% (4,763 of 15,745 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.95 · 27.3% (4,303 of 15,745 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.93 · 36.3% (5,712 of 15,745 decks)
- Twinflame Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 27.6% (4,351 of 15,745 decks)
- Ancient Copper Dragon relevance 0.89 · 35.5% (5,589 of 15,745 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.86 · 38.0% (5,981 of 15,745 decks)
- Bloodthirster relevance 0.85 · 23.4% (3,678 of 15,745 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 1.86 · 72.2% (11,372 of 15,745 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 1.69 · 66.5% (10,476 of 15,745 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 1.60 · 55.1% (8,673 of 15,745 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 1.56 · 75.8% (11,929 of 15,745 decks)
- Sephara, Sky's Blade relevance 1.52 · 53.9% (8,491 of 15,745 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 1.50 · 51.9% (8,174 of 15,745 decks)
- Lord of the Void relevance 1.46 · 46.0% (7,249 of 15,745 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 1.44 · 54.0% (8,497 of 15,745 decks)
- Kaalia, Zenith Seeker relevance 1.41 · 46.3% (7,286 of 15,745 decks)
- Angel of Despair relevance 1.31 · 42.9% (6,752 of 15,745 decks)
- Rakdos, Patron of Chaos relevance 1.29 · 42.3% (6,662 of 15,745 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 1.28 · 40.7% (6,405 of 15,745 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 1.27 · 43.3% (6,812 of 15,745 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 1.26 · 74.5% (11,724 of 15,745 decks)
- Archfiend of Despair relevance 1.25 · 37.8% (5,955 of 15,745 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 1.17 · 40.1% (6,312 of 15,745 decks)
- Reya Dawnbringer relevance 1.15 · 35.9% (5,645 of 15,745 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 1.15 · 36.4% (5,731 of 15,745 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 1.14 · 34.9% (5,499 of 15,745 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 1.10 · 41.9% (6,600 of 15,745 decks)
- Archfiend of Depravity relevance 1.07 · 39.5% (6,215 of 15,745 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.98 · 27.4% (4,314 of 15,745 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.95 · 27.3% (4,303 of 15,745 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.93 · 36.3% (5,712 of 15,745 decks)
- Twinflame Tyrant relevance 0.89 · 27.6% (4,351 of 15,745 decks)
- Ancient Copper Dragon relevance 0.89 · 35.5% (5,589 of 15,745 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.86 · 38.0% (5,981 of 15,745 decks)
- Bloodthirster relevance 0.85 · 23.4% (3,678 of 15,745 decks)
- Isshin, Two Heavens as One relevance 0.83 · 47.8% (7,528 of 15,745 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.82 · 25.6% (4,026 of 15,745 decks)
- Sower of Discord relevance 0.79 · 20.4% (3,216 of 15,745 decks)
- Lyra Dawnbringer relevance 0.75 · 21.6% (3,401 of 15,745 decks)
- Bruna, the Fading Light relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (3,271 of 15,745 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.73 · 20.2% (3,185 of 15,745 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 0.69 · 18.1% (2,855 of 15,745 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (3,155 of 15,745 decks)
- Ancient Brass Dragon relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (3,445 of 15,745 decks)
- Gisela, the Broken Blade relevance 0.66 · 18.0% (2,832 of 15,745 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, Unshackled relevance 0.66 · 16.1% (2,539 of 15,745 decks)
- Burning-Rune Demon relevance 0.66 · 16.5% (2,598 of 15,745 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.84 · 68.0% (10,700 of 15,745 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.75 · 24.0% (3,779 of 15,745 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.66 · 44.3% (6,977 of 15,745 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.65 · 47.7% (7,509 of 15,745 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Dragon Tempest relevance 1.22 · 38.2% (6,014 of 15,745 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.80 · 42.3% (6,653 of 15,745 decks)
All instants (1)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.70 · 37.4% (5,895 of 15,745 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.98 · 30.3% (4,763 of 15,745 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.69 · 39.9% (6,283 of 15,745 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.67 · 41.6% (6,551 of 15,745 decks)
EDH data for Master of Cruelties: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,745 real decks.