Loxodon Convert
Played in 60 Selesnya decks
330+49+1+
Color Identity Spread
38.2% Selesnya
Commanders
Most Relevant
Raptor Companion 58.3% of decks
Raptor Companion 58.3% of decks
Garruk's Gorehorn 60.0% of decks
Garruk's Gorehorn 60.0% of decks
Terrian, World Tyrant 60.0% of decks
Terrian, World Tyrant 60.0% of decks
Orazca Frillback 53.3% of decks
Orazca Frillback 53.3% of decks
Alpha Tyrranax 35.0% of decks
Alpha Tyrranax 35.0% of decks
Quakestrider Ceratops 58.3% of decks
Quakestrider Ceratops 58.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 2.69 · 1.2% (52 of 4,172 decks)
- Torsten Von Ursus relevance 0.64 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.57 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Raptor Companion relevance 2.65 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.43 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.36 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.36 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 2.31 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.25 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.25 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.18 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.08 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.07 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.04 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 2.04 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 2.03 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.92 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.92 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 1.84 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.84 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.82 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.82 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.78 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.75 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.74 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.72 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.69 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 1.67 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.66 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.64 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 1.57 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.56 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Raptor Companion relevance 2.65 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.43 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.36 · 60.0% (36 of 60 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.36 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 2.31 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.25 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.25 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.18 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.07 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.04 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 2.04 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 2.03 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.92 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.92 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 1.84 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 1.84 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.82 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.82 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.78 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.75 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.74 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.72 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.69 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 1.67 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.66 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.66 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.64 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 1.57 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.56 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.55 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 1.54 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Prizefighter Construct relevance 1.53 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.52 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.50 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 1.49 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Golden Bear relevance 1.48 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.48 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.46 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.45 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.40 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.40 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.40 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.35 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.33 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.24 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Whiptail Wurm relevance 1.23 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 1.20 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.20 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.14 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.08 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Loxodon Convert: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.





















