Slumbering Trudge
Played in 488 Gruul decks
1430+45+2+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Gruul
Commanders
Slinza, the Spiked Stampede 7.5% of decks
Slinza, the Spiked Stampede 7.5% of decks
Phylath, World Sculptor 3.4% of decks
Phylath, World Sculptor 3.4% of decks
Tuya Bearclaw 4.6% of decks
Tuya Bearclaw 4.6% of decks
Neyith of the Dire Hunt 1.5% of decks
Neyith of the Dire Hunt 1.5% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper 1.0% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper 1.0% of decks
Hulk, Gamma Goliath 1.5% of decks
Hulk, Gamma Goliath 1.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Krosan Warchief 42.2% of decks
Krosan Warchief 42.2% of decks
Woodland Liege 37.9% of decks
Woodland Liege 37.9% of decks
Wirewood Savage 31.6% of decks
Wirewood Savage 31.6% of decks
Elder Gargaroth 44.7% of decks
Elder Gargaroth 44.7% of decks
Herd Baloth 31.4% of decks
Herd Baloth 31.4% of decks
Thunderfoot Baloth 42.8% of decks
Thunderfoot Baloth 42.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (14)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 3.61 · 7.5% (243 of 3,234 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.84 · 3.4% (35 of 1,038 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 1.19 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 1.04 · 1.5% (15 of 996 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.94 · 1.0% (19 of 1,872 decks)
- Hulk, Gamma Goliath relevance 0.74 · 1.5% (6 of 393 decks)
- Rosheen Meanderer relevance 0.64 · 1.3% (5 of 377 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.62 · 1.6% (4 of 249 decks)
- Ignacio of Myra's Marvels // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.40 · 1.4% (2 of 147 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.29 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.28 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Wyll, Blade of Frontiers relevance 0.23 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.22 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 1.82 · 42.2% (206 of 488 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (185 of 488 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.42 · 31.6% (154 of 488 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.37 · 44.7% (218 of 488 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.35 · 31.4% (153 of 488 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.34 · 42.8% (209 of 488 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.29 · 30.9% (151 of 488 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.28 · 35.2% (172 of 488 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.18 · 41.6% (203 of 488 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.17 · 31.4% (153 of 488 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.13 · 30.1% (147 of 488 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.11 · 38.7% (189 of 488 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (132 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.10 · 45.5% (222 of 488 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.07 · 46.9% (229 of 488 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.06 · 26.0% (127 of 488 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.05 · 32.6% (159 of 488 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.02 · 21.7% (106 of 488 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.99 · 20.1% (98 of 488 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (119 of 488 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.98 · 21.1% (103 of 488 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (133 of 488 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.92 · 29.3% (143 of 488 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.91 · 30.1% (147 of 488 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.87 · 21.1% (103 of 488 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (95 of 488 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (118 of 488 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.80 · 17.8% (87 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 0.79 · 15.6% (76 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.78 · 18.0% (88 of 488 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 1.82 · 42.2% (206 of 488 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (185 of 488 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.42 · 31.6% (154 of 488 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.37 · 44.7% (218 of 488 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.35 · 31.4% (153 of 488 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.34 · 42.8% (209 of 488 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.29 · 30.9% (151 of 488 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.28 · 35.2% (172 of 488 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.18 · 41.6% (203 of 488 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.17 · 31.4% (153 of 488 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.13 · 30.1% (147 of 488 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.11 · 38.7% (189 of 488 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (132 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.10 · 45.5% (222 of 488 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.07 · 46.9% (229 of 488 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.06 · 26.0% (127 of 488 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.05 · 32.6% (159 of 488 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.02 · 21.7% (106 of 488 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.99 · 20.1% (98 of 488 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (119 of 488 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.98 · 21.1% (103 of 488 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (133 of 488 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.91 · 30.1% (147 of 488 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.87 · 21.1% (103 of 488 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (95 of 488 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (118 of 488 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.80 · 17.8% (87 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 0.79 · 15.6% (76 of 488 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.78 · 18.0% (88 of 488 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 0.76 · 14.8% (72 of 488 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.76 · 13.3% (65 of 488 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (79 of 488 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.75 · 28.3% (138 of 488 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 0.74 · 13.5% (66 of 488 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.73 · 13.7% (67 of 488 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (65 of 488 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (73 of 488 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.69 · 19.5% (95 of 488 decks)
- Ridgescale Tusker relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (57 of 488 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.67 · 35.5% (173 of 488 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (60 of 488 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (80 of 488 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (65 of 488 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.64 · 13.1% (64 of 488 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (49 of 488 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Aether Charge relevance 0.77 · 14.8% (72 of 488 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.63 · 24.0% (117 of 488 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.92 · 29.3% (143 of 488 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.61 · 15.6% (76 of 488 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 1.14 · 26.6% (130 of 488 decks)
EDH data for Slumbering Trudge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 488 real decks.






























