Select for Inspection

Played in 228 Dimir decks

Select for Inspection
$0.14 €0.08

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All commanders (2)
  1. Etrata, the Silencer relevance 2.84 · 4.6% (52 of 1,121 decks)
  2. Ghost, Spectral Saboteur relevance 0.37 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sage Owl
    1.48 27.6%
    $0.28 €0.08
  • Unsummon
    1.40 36.4%
    $0.16 €0.06
  • Dimir Infiltrator
    1.34 43.9%
    $0.61 €0.76
  • Telling Time
    1.32 29.8%
    $0.32 €0.21
  • Ninja of the Deep Hours
    1.17 43.0%
    $1.50 €1.73
  • Rags // Riches
    1.17 25.4%
    $0.35 €0.22
  • Devastation Tide
    1.16 26.8%
    $0.42 €0.41
  • Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive
    1.14 43.4%
    $0.22 €0.09
  • Far // Away
    1.14 22.8%
    $0.18 €0.19
  • Familiar's Ruse
    1.12 27.2%
    $0.74 €0.65
All most relevant (30)
  1. Sage Owl relevance 1.48 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
  2. Unsummon relevance 1.40 · 36.4% (83 of 228 decks)
  3. Dimir Infiltrator relevance 1.34 · 43.9% (100 of 228 decks)
  4. Telling Time relevance 1.32 · 29.8% (68 of 228 decks)
  5. Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.17 · 43.0% (98 of 228 decks)
  6. Rags // Riches relevance 1.17 · 25.4% (58 of 228 decks)
  7. Devastation Tide relevance 1.16 · 26.8% (61 of 228 decks)
  8. Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.14 · 43.4% (99 of 228 decks)
  9. Far // Away relevance 1.14 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  10. Familiar's Ruse relevance 1.12 · 27.2% (62 of 228 decks)
  11. Tormented Soul relevance 1.11 · 38.6% (88 of 228 decks)
  12. Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.10 · 41.2% (94 of 228 decks)
  13. Portent relevance 1.09 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
  14. Okiba-Gang Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 24.6% (56 of 228 decks)
  15. Slither Blade relevance 1.06 · 46.9% (107 of 228 decks)
  16. Ornithopter relevance 1.02 · 43.9% (100 of 228 decks)
  17. Unsubstantiate relevance 0.99 · 20.2% (46 of 228 decks)
  18. Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (81 of 228 decks)
  19. Skullsnatcher relevance 0.98 · 30.3% (69 of 228 decks)
  20. Commit // Memory relevance 0.96 · 25.4% (58 of 228 decks)
  21. Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.94 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  22. Treasure Cruise relevance 0.93 · 35.5% (81 of 228 decks)
  23. Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (55 of 228 decks)
  24. Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (55 of 228 decks)
  25. Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 36.0% (82 of 228 decks)
  26. Connive // Concoct relevance 0.91 · 24.6% (56 of 228 decks)
  27. Signal Pest relevance 0.91 · 18.4% (42 of 228 decks)
  28. Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.91 · 36.8% (84 of 228 decks)
  29. Cunning Evasion relevance 0.89 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  30. Rescue relevance 0.89 · 14.0% (32 of 228 decks)

Creatures

27

Showing 1-10 of 27

Page size
  • Sage Owl
    1.48 27.6%
    $0.28 €0.08
  • Dimir Infiltrator
    1.34 43.9%
    $0.61 €0.76
  • Ninja of the Deep Hours
    1.17 43.0%
    $1.50 €1.73
  • Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive
    1.14 43.4%
    $0.22 €0.09
  • Tormented Soul
    1.11 38.6%
    $0.51 €0.49
  • Mistblade Shinobi
    1.10 41.2%
    $3.36 €1.61
  • Okiba-Gang Shinobi
    1.08 24.6%
    $1.18 €1.32
  • Slither Blade
    1.06 46.9%
    $1.51 €0.56
  • Ornithopter
    1.02 43.9%
    $0.28 €0.22
  • Silent-Blade Oni
    0.98 35.5%
    $6.40 €2.92
All creatures (27)
  1. Sage Owl relevance 1.48 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
  2. Dimir Infiltrator relevance 1.34 · 43.9% (100 of 228 decks)
  3. Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.17 · 43.0% (98 of 228 decks)
  4. Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.14 · 43.4% (99 of 228 decks)
  5. Tormented Soul relevance 1.11 · 38.6% (88 of 228 decks)
  6. Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.10 · 41.2% (94 of 228 decks)
  7. Okiba-Gang Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 24.6% (56 of 228 decks)
  8. Slither Blade relevance 1.06 · 46.9% (107 of 228 decks)
  9. Ornithopter relevance 1.02 · 43.9% (100 of 228 decks)
  10. Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (81 of 228 decks)
  11. Skullsnatcher relevance 0.98 · 30.3% (69 of 228 decks)
  12. Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.94 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  13. Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 36.0% (82 of 228 decks)
  14. Signal Pest relevance 0.91 · 18.4% (42 of 228 decks)
  15. Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.91 · 36.8% (84 of 228 decks)
  16. Azra Smokeshaper relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (44 of 228 decks)
  17. Gudul Lurker relevance 0.87 · 25.9% (59 of 228 decks)
  18. Spire Owl relevance 0.85 · 13.2% (30 of 228 decks)
  19. Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.85 · 14.9% (34 of 228 decks)
  20. Augury Owl relevance 0.84 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)
  21. Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.82 · 30.7% (70 of 228 decks)
  22. Prosperous Thief relevance 0.81 · 33.8% (77 of 228 decks)
  23. Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.78 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
  24. Moonblade Shinobi relevance 0.76 · 19.3% (44 of 228 decks)
  25. Vodalian Illusionist relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (27 of 228 decks)
  26. Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.76 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)
  27. Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.75 · 20.6% (47 of 228 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Cunning Evasion
    0.89 22.8%
    $0.38 €0.24
  • Vanishing
    0.75 14.0%
    $0.40 €0.47
All enchantments (2)
  1. Cunning Evasion relevance 0.89 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  2. Vanishing relevance 0.75 · 14.0% (32 of 228 decks)

Instants

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
  • Unsummon
    1.40 36.4%
    $0.16 €0.06
  • Telling Time
    1.32 29.8%
    $0.32 €0.21
  • Far // Away
    1.14 22.8%
    $0.18 €0.19
  • Familiar's Ruse
    1.12 27.2%
    $0.74 €0.65
  • Unsubstantiate
    0.99 20.2%
    $0.36 €0.17
  • Commit // Memory
    0.96 25.4%
    $0.35 €0.32
  • Discovery // Dispersal
    0.92 24.1%
    $0.13 €0.19
  • Consign // Oblivion
    0.92 24.1%
    $0.23 €0.29
  • Rescue
    0.89 14.0%
    $0.34 €0.10
  • Fading Hope
    0.81 15.8%
    $0.27 €0.17
All instants (10)
  1. Unsummon relevance 1.40 · 36.4% (83 of 228 decks)
  2. Telling Time relevance 1.32 · 29.8% (68 of 228 decks)
  3. Far // Away relevance 1.14 · 22.8% (52 of 228 decks)
  4. Familiar's Ruse relevance 1.12 · 27.2% (62 of 228 decks)
  5. Unsubstantiate relevance 0.99 · 20.2% (46 of 228 decks)
  6. Commit // Memory relevance 0.96 · 25.4% (58 of 228 decks)
  7. Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (55 of 228 decks)
  8. Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (55 of 228 decks)
  9. Rescue relevance 0.89 · 14.0% (32 of 228 decks)
  10. Fading Hope relevance 0.81 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)

Sorceries

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Rags // Riches
    1.17 25.4%
    $0.35 €0.22
  • Devastation Tide
    1.16 26.8%
    $0.42 €0.41
  • Portent
    1.09 27.6%
    $0.39 €0.72
  • Treasure Cruise
    0.93 35.5%
    $0.33 €0.14
  • Connive // Concoct
    0.91 24.6%
    $0.28 €0.16
  • Never // Return
    0.81 15.8%
    $0.16 €0.23
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    0.80 17.1%
    $1.79 €1.54
All sorceries (7)
  1. Rags // Riches relevance 1.17 · 25.4% (58 of 228 decks)
  2. Devastation Tide relevance 1.16 · 26.8% (61 of 228 decks)
  3. Portent relevance 1.09 · 27.6% (63 of 228 decks)
  4. Treasure Cruise relevance 0.93 · 35.5% (81 of 228 decks)
  5. Connive // Concoct relevance 0.91 · 24.6% (56 of 228 decks)
  6. Never // Return relevance 0.81 · 15.8% (36 of 228 decks)
  7. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.80 · 17.1% (39 of 228 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Kaito, Dancing Shadow
    0.81 21.1%
    $0.39 €0.41
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Kaito, Dancing Shadow relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (48 of 228 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Halimar Depths
    0.88 31.1%
    $0.37 €0.66
  • Isolated Watchtower
    0.81 12.3%
    $1.31 €0.96
All utility lands (2)
  1. Halimar Depths relevance 0.88 · 31.1% (71 of 228 decks)
  2. Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.81 · 12.3% (28 of 228 decks)

Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.89 45.6%
    $0.29 €0.13
All lands (1)
  1. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.89 · 45.6% (104 of 228 decks)

EDH data for Select for Inspection: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 228 real decks.