Hypergenesis
Played in 151 Glint-Eye decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (1)
- Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder relevance 0.95 · 2.6% (145 of 5,536 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Glimpse of Tomorrow relevance 1.27 · 28.5% (43 of 151 decks)
- Living End relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 0.99 · 54.3% (82 of 151 decks)
- Violent Outburst relevance 0.92 · 27.2% (41 of 151 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.89 · 53.6% (81 of 151 decks)
- Demonic Dread relevance 0.89 · 24.5% (37 of 151 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.87 · 38.4% (58 of 151 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.84 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Halo Forager relevance 0.84 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Twilight's Call relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Furnace Host Charger relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Lava Serpent relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Arcane Proxy relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Waker of Waves relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.80 · 43.0% (65 of 151 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Monstrous Carabid relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.80 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.79 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.79 · 51.0% (77 of 151 decks)
- Shefet Archfiend relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.84 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Halo Forager relevance 0.84 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Furnace Host Charger relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Lava Serpent relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Arcane Proxy relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Waker of Waves relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Canyon Crawler relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Monstrous Carabid relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Rocksteady, Crash Courser relevance 0.80 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.79 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.79 · 51.0% (77 of 151 decks)
- Shefet Archfiend relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Malboro relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Ruin Grinder relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Chitin Gravestalker relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Desert Cerodon relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Yidaro, Wandering Monster relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Hill Gigas relevance 0.77 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.77 · 44.4% (67 of 151 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.77 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Deadshot Minotaur relevance 0.76 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.75 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Eldrazi Ravager relevance 0.75 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.87 · 38.4% (58 of 151 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 0.74 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- New Perspectives relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Unpredictable Cyclone relevance 0.76 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
All instants (2)
- Violent Outburst relevance 0.92 · 27.2% (41 of 151 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Glimpse of Tomorrow relevance 1.27 · 28.5% (43 of 151 decks)
- Living End relevance 1.12 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 0.99 · 54.3% (82 of 151 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.89 · 53.6% (81 of 151 decks)
- Demonic Dread relevance 0.89 · 24.5% (37 of 151 decks)
- Twilight's Call relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.80 · 43.0% (65 of 151 decks)
EDH data for Hypergenesis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 151 real decks.